ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2019
Effects of an Additional Liquid Based Cytology Prepate on Cytological Diagnosis in High-Risk HPV Positive, PaP Test Negative Cases.
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of high-risk human papillomavirus genotyping for cervical cancer screening. A multicentre screening cohort study in rural China.Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the effects of a second cytology preparation on cytological diagnosis in high-risk HPV positive and PaP smear-negative cases.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted with 57 cases who underwent cytological evaluation and cotest in our center in 2016-2017. All of these cases were high-risk HPV positive, PaP smear-negative and had a second preparation. All preparations were re-evaluated by a cytopathologist and a pathologist. Twenty-five of the cases who had a positive diagnosis in the second preparation had a cervical biopsy.
resultsIn 46 (80%) of the cases, the cytological diagnosis was the same and negative in the first and second preparations. Second preparations of 11 cases (19.2%) were positive. Twenty of 25 patients (77%) with cervical biopsy had premalignant lesion.
conclusionIn high-risk HPV positive and PaP smear-negative cases, patient management is different from cases where these two tests are positive together. According to our results, 19.2% of high-risk HPV positive and PaP smear-negative cases were given positive cytological diagnosis by second cytology preparation. Biopsy results support our cytological findings. The incidence of positive cytological diagnosis increases in PaP smear with the second preparation. With this protocol, patient management changes, follow-up time and number can be reduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.