ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2019
Evaluation of Treatment Models in the Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity.
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of anti-VEGF therapy versus laser therapy on mortality and treatment outcomes in retinopathy of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Pooled it
- Parental Awareness of Retinopathy of Prematurity in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Study.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2025Article
- Retinopathy of Prematurity: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Treatment Outcomes in a Tertiary Care Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Frequency of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in infants screened for ROP: two years follow-up results of a single center in Turkey.BioMedicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the treatment modalities applied for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and to determine the efficacy and results of treatment modalities.
methodsPremature babies, who needed treatment for ROP and followed-up in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of our hospital or external centers, were retrospectively evaluated between January 2012 and January 2017. According to the criteria determined by the International ROP committee, the zones and stages of the cases were recorded. In this study, patients were evaluated in three groups. Group 1: plus disease with any stage in zone 1, group 2: plus disease in zone 2, together with stage 2 or 3, group 3: classified as aggressive posterior retinopathy (APROP). The birth weight, gestational age, treatment weeks and treatments that were administered were recorded. Regression in plus disease, macular dragging and retinal detachment did not develop were evaluated as successful treatment.
results1746 preterm babies were examined. 65 (3.7%) preterm babies were included in this study, 31 female and 34 male. 126 eyes of preterm babies were intervened. The mean birth weight was 1159 (535-2200) grams, and the mean gestational age was 28.4±2.5 (24-34) weeks. Group 1 had 33 eyes (26.1%), group 2 had 71 eyes (56.3%), and group 3 had 22 eyes (17.4%). 94 eyes (74.6%) were treated once, 26 eyes (20.6%) were treated twice, 6 eyes (4.8%) received treatment three times. The first treatment was applied at 36±2.4 (32-41) weeks. The first treatment was performed with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in 75.8% of group 1 and 95.5% of group 3, and with diode laser photocoagulation (LPC) in 78.9% of group 2. There was a significant correlation between birth week and birth weight and first treatment week. Re-treatment was applied to 32,8% in LPC group and 19.2% in the IVB group due to recurrence. 5 eyes which were applied LPC+IVB did not need any re-treatment. Stage 4a retinal detachment developed in both eyes of 1 patient from group 1. Macular traction was developed in 2 eyes of 1 patient in group 2. After the treatments, success in 122 eyes (96.8%) was obtained.
conclusionROP can be controlled by convenient and effective treatment. Although conventional LPC is still the first treatment option for ROP, IVB alone or combination with LPC is a highly effective treatment option for zone 1 disease and APROP. IVB reduces the number of ROP treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.