Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32377037›Full record

ReviewPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology2020

Multigene CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of hybrid proline rich proteins (HyPRPs) for sustainable multi-stress tolerance in crops: the review of a promising approach.

Banashree Saikia, Sanjay Singh, Johni Debbarma, Natarajan Velmurugan, Hariprasanna Dekaboruah, Kallare P Arunkumar, Channakeshavaiah Chikkaputtaiah

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Proline Tagging for Stress Tolerance in Plants.International journal of genomics · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Banashree Saikia1Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology (CSIR-NEIST), Jorhat, Assam 785006 India.ORCID 0000-0001-8956-0730
Sanjay Singh1Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology (CSIR-NEIST), Jorhat, Assam 785006 India.
Johni Debbarma1Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology (CSIR-NEIST), Jorhat, Assam 785006 India.ORCID 0000-0002-7108-6601
Natarajan Velmurugan2Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-NEIST Campus, Jorhat, Assam 785006 India.ORCID 0000-0002-7422-0001
Hariprasanna Dekaboruah1Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology (CSIR-NEIST), Jorhat, Assam 785006 India.ORCID 0000-0002-8273-8652
Kallare P Arunkumar4Central Muga Eri Research and Training Institute (CMER&TI), Lahdoigarh, Jorhat, Assam 785700 India.ORCID 0000-0002-1588-4887
Channakeshavaiah Chikkaputtaiah1Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology (CSIR-NEIST), Jorhat, Assam 785006 India.ORCID 0000-0001-7329-8643
North East Institute of Science and Technology · INCentral Muga Eri Research and Training Institute · INNorth Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent global climate change has directly impacted major biotic and abiotic stress factors affecting crop productivity worldwide. Therefore, the need of the hour is to develop sustainable multiple stress tolerant crops through modern biotechnological approaches to cope with climate change. Hybrid proline rich proteins (HyPRPs) are the cell-wall structural proteins, which contain an N-terminal repetitive proline-rich domain and a C-terminal conserved eight-cysteine motif domain. HyPRPs are known to regulate multiple abiotic and biotic stress responses in plants. Recently, a few HyPRPs have been characterized as negative regulators of abiotic and biotic stress responses in different plants. Disruption of such negative regulators for desirable positive phenotypic traits has been made possible through the advent of advanced genome engineering tools. In the past few years, CRISPR/Cas9 has emerged as a novel breakthrough technology for crop improvement by target specific editing of known negative regulatory host genes. Here, we have described the mechanism of action and the role of known HyPRPs in regulating different biotic and abiotic stress responses in major crop plants. We have also discussed the importance of the CRISPR/Cas9 based genome editing system in targeting known negative regulatory HyPRPs for multi-stress crop tolerance using the tomato crop model. Application of genome editing to manipulate the HyPRPs of major crop plants holds promise in developing newer stress management methods in this rapidly changing climate and would lead in the future to sustain crop productivity.

Indexed as

8CMCRISPR/Cas9HyPRPsMultiplex-multigeneMulti-stress toleranceSustainable

Identifiers

PMID32377037
PMCPMC7196567
OpenAlexW3017935245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.