Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32376836›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

The cherry 6+9K SNP array: a cost-effective improvement to the cherry 6K SNP array for genetic studies.

Stijn Vanderzande, Ping Zheng, Lichun Cai, Goran Barac, Ksenija Gasic, Dorrie Main, Amy Iezzoni, Cameron Peace

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic architecture of cherry leaf spot (Horticulture research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development and Evaluation of an AxiomPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stijn VanderzandeDepartment of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA. stijn.vanderzande@wsu.edu.
Ping ZhengDepartment of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Lichun CaiDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Goran BaracDepartment of Fruit Growing, Viticulture, Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Ksenija GasicDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Dorrie MainDepartment of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Amy IezzoniDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Cameron PeaceDepartment of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Washington State University · USMichigan State University · USClemson University · USUniversity of Novi Sad · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cherry breeding and genetic studies can benefit from genome-wide genetic marker assays. Currently, a 6K SNP array enables genome scans in cherry; however, only a third of these SNPs are informative, with low coverage in many genomic regions. Adding previously detected SNPs to this array could provide a cost-efficient upgrade with increased genomic coverage across the 670 cM/352.9 Mb cherry whole genome sequence. For sweet cherry, new SNPs were chosen following a focal point strategy, grouping six to eight SNPs within 10-kb windows with an average of 0.6 cM (627 kb) between focal points. Additional SNPs were chosen to represent important regions. Sweet cherry, the fruticosa subgenome of sour cherry, and cherry organellar genomes were targeted with 6942, 2020, and 38 new SNPs, respectively. The +9K add-on provided 2128, 1091, and 70 new reliable, polymorphic SNPs for sweet cherry and the avium and the fruticosa subgenomes of sour cherry, respectively. For sweet cherry, 1241 reliable polymorphic SNPs formed 237 informative focal points, with another 2504 SNPs in-between. The +9K SNPs increased genetic resolution and genome coverage of the original cherry SNP array and will help increase understanding of the genetic control of key traits and relationships among individuals in cherry.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideBreedingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPrunusQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID32376836
PMCPMC7203174
OpenAlexW3021415583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.