Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32376819›Full record

ReviewTranslational psychiatry2020

Rodent models of post-traumatic stress disorder: behavioral assessment.

Alexander Verbitsky, David Dopfel, Nanyin Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 228 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A Neurotensin Brake on Exploratory Drive under Persistent Threat.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander VerbitskyDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4955-5448
David DopfelDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3113-2594
Nanyin ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. nuz2@psu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5824-9058
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Mechanistic dissection of the neural basis of the resting-state fMRI signal using multi-modal approachesRF1MH114224 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI DREW, PATRICK JAMES, ZHANG, NANYIN · 2017 to 2018
$3.8M
Resting-state Neural Networks in Awake RodentsR01NS085200 · NINDS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI ZHANG, NANYIN · 2013 to 2024
$3.4M
Longitudinal assessment of trauma on neural circuitry development into adulthoodR01MH098003 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI KING, JEAN A, ZHANG, NANYIN · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098003NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH114224NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085200U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R01MH098003U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) RF1MH114224U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) R01NS085200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the etiology and expression of psychiatric disorders are complex, mammals show biologically preserved behavioral and neurobiological responses to valent stimuli which underlie the use of rodent models of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD is a complex phenotype that is difficult to model in rodents because it is diagnosed by patient interview and influenced by both environmental and genetic factors. However, given that PTSD results from traumatic experiences, rodent models can simulate stress induction and disorder development. By manipulating stress type, intensity, duration, and frequency, preclinical models reflect core PTSD phenotypes, measured through various behavioral assays. Paradigms precipitate the disorder by applying physical, social, and psychological stressors individually or in combination. This review discusses the methods used to trigger and evaluate PTSD-like phenotypes. It highlights studies employing each stress model and evaluates their translational efficacies against DSM-5, validity criteria, and criteria proposed by Yehuda and Antelman's commentary in 1993. This is intended to aid in paradigm selection by informing readers about rodent models, their benefits to the clinical community, challenges associated with the translational models, and opportunities for future work. To inform PTSD model validity and relevance to human psychopathology, we propose that models incorporate behavioral test batteries, individual differences, sex differences, strain and stock differences, early life stress effects, biomarkers, stringent success criteria for drug development, Research Domain Criteria, technological advances, and cross-species comparisons. We conclude that, despite the challenges, animal studies will be pivotal to advances in understanding PTSD and the neurobiology of stress.

Indexed as

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAnimalsBehavior Rating ScaleDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMaleRodentiaStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID32376819
PMCPMC7203017
OpenAlexW3022110985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.