Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32376748›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Patients' perspectives of facilitators and barriers to patient-centred care: insights from qualitative patient interviews.

Vera Vennedey, Kira Isabel Hower, Hendrik Hillen, Lena Ansmann, Ludwig Kuntz, Stephanie Stock, Cologne Research and Development Network (CoRe-Net)

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vera VennedeyInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany vera.vennedey@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4977-750X
Kira Isabel HowerInstitute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Hendrik HillenDepartment of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Lena AnsmannDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Organizational Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Ludwig KuntzDepartment of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Stephanie StockInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Cologne Research and Development Network (CoRe-Net)
University of Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrevious studies on patient-centred care (PCC) and its facilitators and barriers usually considered specific patient groups, healthcare settings and aspects of PCC or focused on expert perspectives. The objective of this study was to analyse patients' perspectives of facilitators and barriers towards implementing PCC.

designWe conducted semistructured individual interviews with chronically ill patients. The interviewees were encouraged to share positive and negative experiences of care and the related facilitators and barriers in all settings including preventive, acute and chronic health issues. Interview data were analysed based on the concept of content analysis.

settingInterviews took place at the University Hospital Cologne, nursing homes, at participants' homes or by telephone.

participantsAny person with at least one chronic illness living in the region of Cologne was eligible for participation. 25 persons with an average age of 60 years participated in the interviews. The participants suffered from various chronic conditions including mental health problems, oncological, metabolic, neurological diseases, but also shared experiences related to acute health issues.

resultsParticipants described facilitators and barriers of PCC on the microlevel (eg, patient-provider interaction), mesolevel (eg, health and social care organisation, HSCO) and macrolevel (eg, laws, financing). In addition to previous concepts, interviewees illustrated the importance of being an active patient by taking individual responsibility for health. Interviewees considered functioning teams and healthy staff members a facilitator of PCC as this can compensate stressful situations or lack of staff to some degree. A lack of transparency in financing and reimbursement was identified as barrier to PCC.

conclusionIndividual providers and HSCOs can address many facilitators and barriers of PCC as perceived by patients. Large-scale changes such as reduction of administrative barriers, the expansion of care networks or higher mandatory nurse to patient ratios require political action and incentives. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011925.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchcare processinterviewpatient-centred carepatient-provider interactionqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32376748
PMCPMC7223019
OpenAlexW3023509907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.