Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32376004›Full record

ReviewL'Encephale2020

[Informations on psychotropics and their adaptations for patients suffering from mental disorders in France during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic].

H Javelot, P-M Llorca, D Drapier, E Fakra, C Hingray, G Meyer, S Dizet, A Egron, C Straczek, M Roser and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in L'Encephale, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. FMC : Formacion medica continuada en atencion primaria · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Cannabinoids and COVID-19.Medical cannabis and cannabinoids · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

H JavelotÉtablissement Public de Santé Alsace Nord, Brumath, France; Laboratoire de toxicologie et pharmacologie neuro-cardiovasculaire, université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. Electronic address: herve.javelot@ch-epsan.fr.
P-M LlorcaCHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
D DrapierPôle hospitalo-universitaire de psychiatrie adulte, centre hospitalier Guillaume-Régnier, Rennes, France; EA 4712, comportements et noyaux gris centraux, université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
E FakraPôle universitaire de psychiatrie, CHU de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France.
C HingrayPôle hospitalo-universitaire de psychiatrie d'adultes du Grand Nancy, centre psychothérapique de Nancy, Laxou, France; Département de neurologie, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
G MeyerService de pharmacie, Établissement Public de Santé Alsace Nord, Brumath, France; Service de pharmacie, CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
S DizetService de pharmacie, CHS de Sevrey, Chalon-sur-Saône, France.
A EgronService de pharmacie, centre hospitalier de Cadillac, Cadillac, France.
C StraczekDépartement de pharmacie, CHU Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France; Institut Mondor de recherche biomédical, Inserm U955, équipe 15 neuropsychiatrie translationnelle, Créteil, France.
M RoserInstitut Mondor de recherche biomédical, Inserm U955, équipe 15 neuropsychiatrie translationnelle, Créteil, France; Service de psychiatrie sectorisée, hôpital Albert-Chenevier, Créteil, France.
M MassonNightingale Hospitals-Paris, clinique du Château de Garches, Garches, France; SHU, GHU psychiatrie et neurosciences, Paris, France.
R GaillardGHU psychiatrie et neurosciences, université de Paris, Paris, France; Sous-section 49-03, Conseil national des universités (CNU), Paris, France.
P FossatiInserm U1127, service de psychiatrie adultes, ICM, groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne université, AP-HP, Paris, France.
E HaffenCIC-1431 Inserm, service de psychiatrie, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France; Laboratoire de neurosciences, université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
Inserm · FRFHU Neurovasc · FRObservatoire Régional de la Santé d’Alsace · FRCEA Paris-Saclay · FRCentre Hospitalier Guillaume Régnier · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2019-20 coronavirus pandemic (SARS-CoV-2; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has dramatic consequences on populations in terms of morbidity and mortality and in social terms, the general confinement of almost half of the world's population being a situation unprecedented in history, which is difficult today to measure the impact at the individual and collective levels. More specifically, it affects people with various risk factors, which are more frequent in patients suffering from psychiatric disorders. Psychiatrists need to know: (i) how to identify, the risks associated with the prescription of psychotropic drugs and which can prove to be counterproductive in their association with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019), (ii) how to assess in terms of benefit/risk ratio, the implication of any hasty and brutal modification on psychotropic drugs that can induce confusion for a differential diagnosis with the evolution of COVID-19. We carried out a review of the literature aimed at assessing the specific benefit/risk ratio of psychotropic treatments in patients suffering from COVID-19. Clinically, symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 (fever, cough, dyspnea, digestive signs) can be caused by various psychotropic drugs and require vigilance to avoid false negatives and false positives. In infected patients, psychotropic drugs should be used with caution, especially in the elderly, considering the pulmonary risk. Lithium and Clozapine, which are the reference drugs in bipolar disorder and resistant schizophrenia, warrant specific attention. For these two treatments the possibility of a reduction in the dosage - in case of minimal infectious signs and in a situation, which does not allow rapid control - should ideally be considered taking into account the clinical response (even biological; plasma concentrations) observed in the face of previous dose reductions. Tobacco is well identified for its effects as an inducer of CYP1A2 enzyme. In a COVID+ patient, the consequences of an abrupt cessation of smoking, particularly related with the appearance of respiratory symptoms (cough, dyspnea), must therefore be anticipated for patients receiving psychotropics metabolized by CYP1A2. Plasma concentrations of these drugs are expected to decrease and can be related to an increase risk of relapse. The symptomatic treatments used in COVID-19 have frequent interactions with the most used psychotropics. If there is no curative treatment for infection to SARS-CoV-2, the interactions of the various molecules currently tested with several classes of psychotropic drugs (antidepressants, antipsychotics) are important to consider because of the risk of changes in cardiac conduction. Specific knowledge on COVID-19 remains poor today, but we must recommend rigor in this context in the use of psychotropic drugs, to avoid adding, in patients suffering from psychiatric disorders, potentially vulnerable in the epidemic context, an iatrogenic risk or loss of efficiency.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAge FactorsAntiviral AgentsBiotransformationCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityContinuity of Patient CareCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentCytochrome P-450 CYP1A2Drug InteractionsFeverFranceAntiviral AgentsCYP1A2 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP1A2Pharmaceutical PreparationsPsychotropic DrugsCOVID-19Drug interactionsIntéractions médicamenteusesPsychotropesPsychotropics

Identifiers

PMID32376004
PMCPMC7196532
OpenAlexW3021154535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.