Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375894›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2020

Clinical parameters predictive for sphincter-preserving surgery and prognostic outcome in patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer.

Richard Partl, Marton Magyar, Eva Hassler, Tanja Langsenlehner, Karin Sigrid Kapp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard PartlDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz (CCC), Auenbruggerplatz 32, 8036, Graz, Austria. richard.partl@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9132-012X
Marton MagyarDivision of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz (CCC), Auenbruggerplatz 9, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Eva HasslerDivision of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz (CCC), Auenbruggerplatz 9, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Tanja LangsenlehnerDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz (CCC), Auenbruggerplatz 32, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Karin Sigrid KappDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz (CCC), Auenbruggerplatz 32, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Medical University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough controversial, there are data suggesting that clinical parameters can predict the probability of sphincter preserving procedures in rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between clinical parameters and the sphincter-preserving surgery rate in patients who had undergone neoadjuvant combination therapy for advanced low rectal cancer.

methodsIn this single center study, the charts of 540 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who had been treated with induction chemotherapy-and/or neoadjuvant concomitant radiochemotherapy (nRCT) over an 11-year period were reviewed in order to identify patients with rectal cancer ≤6 cm from the anal verge, who had received the prescribed nRCT only. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify pretreatment patient- and tumor associated parameters correlating with sphincter preservation. Survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analyses.

resultsTwo hundred eighty of the 540 patients met the selection criteria. Of the 280 patients included in the study, 158 (56.4%) underwent sphincter-preserving surgery. One hundred sixty-four of 280 patients (58.6%) had a downsizing of the primary tumor (ypT < cT) and 39 (23.8%) of these showed a complete histopathological response (ypT0 ypN0). In univariate analysis, age prior to treatment, Karnofsky performance status, clinical T-size, relative lymphocyte value, CRP value, and interval between nRCT and surgery, were significantly associated with sphincter-preserving surgery. In multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.05, CI95%: 1.02-1.09, p = 0.003), relative lymphocyte value (HR = 0.94, CI95%: 0.89-0.99, p = 0.029), and interval between nRCT and surgery (HR = 2.39, CI95%: 1.17-4.88, p = 0.016) remained as independent predictive parameters.

conclusionsThese clinical parameters can be considered in the prognostication of sphincter-preserving surgery in case of low rectal adenocarcinoma. More future research is required in this area.

Indexed as

Organ Sparing TreatmentsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnal CanalChemoradiotherapyFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeClinical parametersLow rectal cancerPredictive factorsSphincter-preserving surgery

Identifiers

PMID32375894
PMCPMC7203844
OpenAlexW3022973322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.