Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375842›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2020

Undertriage in trauma: an ignored quality indicator?

Elisabeth Jeppesen, Mathias Cuevas-Østrem, Cathrine Gram-Knutsen, Oddvar Uleberg

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Adherence to national trauma triage criteria in Norway: a cross-sectional study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth JeppesenDepartment of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, NO-0103, Oslo, Norway. elisabeth.jeppesen@norskluftambulanse.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5949-9377
Mathias Cuevas-ØstremDepartment of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, NO-0103, Oslo, Norway.
Cathrine Gram-KnutsenFaculty of Health Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Oddvar UlebergDepartment of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, NO-0103, Oslo, Norway.
Stiftelsen Norsk Luftambulanse · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity of Stavanger · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly identification of life-threatening injuries is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality in trauma patients. Failure to detect severe injury may cause delayed diagnosis and therapeutic interventions and is associated with increased morbidity. A national trauma system will contribute to ensure the optimal care for seriously injured patients throughout the treatment chain by, among other things, defining a sensitive triage tool for identifying severe injury and contribute to correct treatment destination. In 2017, a National trauma plan was implemented in Norway and several quality indicators were recommended to ensure an evaluation of potential gaps between achieved and desired quality, and thereby highlighting areas with potential for quality improvement. With this commentary, we want to draw attention to, what we believe is, an ignoring of an important quality indicator: undertriage in trauma. MAIN BODY: Severely injured patients not met by a trauma team is commonly referred to as undertriage. An undertriage rate below 5 % is an internationally recognized quality indicator in trauma care and is emphasized in the Norwegian national trauma plan. However, whether hospitals measure and report data about undertriage, have received little attention. Therefore, a national survey was performed among Norwegian hospitals, where thirty-seven of forty trauma receiving hospitals contributed. The results of the survey showed that only half of Norwegian trauma hospitals were capable of providing these data. The results of this survey show that currently the national trauma system is not equipped to obtain important data on an important and specific quality indicator. An ongoing discussion at a national level is how to define severe injury, which may alter future definitions on undertriage.

conclusionsKnowledge of undertriage in trauma is important to enhance patient safety, increase the precision of the triage tool and provide valuable learning information to individual hospitals and prehospital services. Currently only half of Norwegian hospitals who receive trauma patients report undertriage rates and unfortunately, only few hospital administrators request these data.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementFemaleHumansMalePatient SafetyRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTrauma CentersTriageWounds and InjuriesQuality indicatorTrauma systemUndertriage

Identifiers

PMID32375842
PMCPMC7204312
OpenAlexW3020897576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.