Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375808›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Obstetric triage systems: a systematic review of measurement properties (Clinimetric).

Asieh Moudi, Mina Iravani, Mahin Najafian, Armin Zareiyan, Arash Forouzan, Mojgan Mirghafourvand

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Reliability of Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021
    Article
  9. Triage Strategies for COVID-19 Cases: A Scope Review.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Asieh MoudiMidwifery Department, Reproductive Health Promotion Research Center, Nursing and Midwifery School, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Mina IravaniMidwifery Department, Reproductive Health Promotion Research Center, Nursing and Midwifery School, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. minairavani2004@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8854-1738
Mahin NajafianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Fertility Infertility and Perinatology Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Armin ZareiyanPublic Health Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arash ForouzanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Imam Khomeini General Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Mojgan MirghafourvandMidwifery Department, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences IR.AJUMS.REC.1397.537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince labor and delivery units often serve as emergency units for pregnant women, the use of obstetric triage systems with poor or inadequate quality can lead to unintended consequences such as over and under-triage and so a waste of humans and financial resources. Therefore, this systematic review was conducted to evaluate the measurement properties of obstetric triage tools.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, and Medline were searched to identify studies in October 2018 and were updated in May 2019. The risk of bias COSMIN checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The quality of every measurement property was appraised by the update criteria of COSMIN. Evidence quality was judged using the modified GRADE approach.

resultsA total of 444 studies were retrieved in initial search. Six studies evaluating 4 tools were included in this study. All the included studies reported only content validity and reliability. The quality of evidence varied from very low to moderate. The quality of content validity and reliability of the included tools was sufficient except for the reliability of the maternal-fetal triage index. The obstetric triage acuity scale (OTAS) was found to have higher reliability than other tools.

conclusionsDue to insufficient evidence, the conclusions about the quality of measurement properties of each obstetric triage tool may be uncertain. This review emphasizes the necessity for further studies with robust methodological quality on the measurement properties of obstetric triage tools.

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricChecklistEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsTriageCOSMINMeasurement propertiesObstetricPregnancySystematic reviewTriage

Identifiers

PMID32375808
PMCPMC7203833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.