Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375804›Full record

SynthesisGlobalization and health2020

Global Health diplomacy for noncommunicable diseases prevention and control: a systematic review.

Mahnaz Afshari, Ahmad Ahmadi Teymourlouy, Mohsen Asadi-Lari, Mohammadreza Maleki

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Globalization and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Spatial Aspects of Health-Developing a Conceptual Framework.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence and Predicting Risk Factors of Polypharmacy in Azar Cohort Population.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Risk Factors for Locomotive Crew Members Depending on Their Place of Work.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Prioritizing noncommunicable diseases in the Americas region in the era of COVID-19.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahnaz AfshariDepartment of Health Service Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad Ahmadi TeymourlouyDepartment of Health Service Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ahmadi.sa@iums.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0003-1067-6146
Mohsen Asadi-LariDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammadreza MalekiDepartment of Health Service Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are one of the main challenges of healthcare systems around the world. In addition to the technical level, it requires political negotiations and solutions, such as global health diplomacy (GHD), which involves the participation of a wide range of actors and stakeholders and innovative international health partnerships. This review aimed to draw lessons for strengthening linkages with a wide range of actors and stakeholders from the GHD literature for NCDs, and how policymakers and political leaders can effectively use international health partnerships to beat NCDs.

methodsThis research was a systematic review of the literature on GHD for NCDs. All relevant articles published in English were identified by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases, Google and Google Scholar search engines, and the reference lists of identified articles as well as a number of special journals. 30 articles that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed using content analysis in MAXQDA 10. The Global Health Diplomacy Pyramid and Blouin and Dubé's (2010) analytical framework for examining negotiations were used to classify the data.

findings30 articles have been published on GHD for NCDs. Five key themes, i.e. the specific problem requiring global collective action, key actors, their interests in the problem, potential negotiation process, and potential scenarios for collective action and 46 sub-themes were identified. Moreover, given the importance of collaboration on NCDs in the international arena, actors were categorized into three groups based on the GHD Pyramid: (1) core diplomacy, (2) multi-stakeholder diplomacy, and (3) informal diplomacy.

conclusionDevelopment and adoption of a global policy to tackle the rise in NCDs in developed and developing countries require policymakers and political leaders that participate in GHD. Successful developments in global health policy depend on the performance of and respectful relationships among the stakeholders, and global health diplomats need to understand the complexities of the institutional structures and functional relationships of the international institutions involved in health.

Indexed as

DiplomacyGlobal HealthHealth PolicyHumansInternational CooperationNegotiatingNoncommunicable DiseasesPublic PolicyDiplomacyGlobal HealthInternational cooperationNoncommunicable diseasesPolicymakingReview [publication type]

Identifiers

PMID32375804
PMCPMC7201808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.