Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375745›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

GP trainees' perceptions on learning EBM using conversations in the workplace: a video-stimulated interview study.

Lisanne S Welink, Esther de Groot, Peter Pype, Kaatje Van Roy, Iris D van den Wittenboer, Marie-Louise E L Bartelink, Roger A M J Damoiseaux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisanne S WelinkJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. l.s.welink@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0525-2333
Esther de GrootJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter PypeDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Kaatje Van RoyDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Iris D van den WittenboerJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marie-Louise E L BartelinkJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roger A M J DamoiseauxJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 839130005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo be able to practice evidence-based medicine (EBM) when making decisions for individual patients, it is important to learn how to combine the best available evidence with the patient's preferences and the physician's clinical expertise. In general practice training, these skills can be learned at the workplace using learning conversations: meetings between the supervising general practitioner (GP) and GP trainee to discuss medical practice, selected topics or professional performance. This study aimed to give insight into the perceptions of GP trainees on their EBM learning processes during learning conversations.

methodsWe held semi-structured video-stimulated elicitation interviews (n = 22) with GP trainees affiliated to GP training institutes in the Netherlands and Belgium. GP trainees were shown fragments of their learning conversations, enabling reflection during the interview. Taking an inductive approach, interview recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed with NVivo software.

resultsGP trainees perceived learning conversations as useful for learning and discussing EBM. Multiple EBM learning activities were identified, such as discussing evidence together, relating evidence to cases in daily practice and discussing the supervisor's experience and the specific local context in the light of what the evidence recommends. However, for learning to occur, trainees need and expect specific behaviour, both from their supervisors and themselves. Supervisors should supply well-substantiated answers that are applicable in practice and give the trainee confirmation. In turn, the trainee needs to prepare well in order to ask focused, in-depth questions. A safe space allowing equal and open discussion between trainee and supervisor is perceived as an essential context for optimal EBM learning.

conclusionsOur findings show that trainees find learning conversations useful for EBM learning in general practice. To bring EBM learning to its full potential, attention should be paid to optimising the behavioural and contextual factors found relevant to enhancing EBM learning.

Indexed as

LearningPerceptionAdultBelgiumEducation, Medical, GraduateEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleNetherlandsQualitative ResearchStudents, MedicalEvidence-based medicineFamily medicineGeneral practiceLearning conversationsVideo-stimulated elicitation interviewsWorkplace-based learning

Identifiers

PMID32375745
PMCPMC7201965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.