Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375725›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Experiences of rural women with damages resulting from an earthquake in Iran: a qualitative study.

Javad Yoosefi Lebni, Farhad Khorami, Farbod Ebadi Fard Azar, Bahar Khosravi, Hossein Safari, Arash Ziapour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Javad Yoosefi LebniHealth Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farhad KhoramiMaster of Clinical Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah Branch, Kermanshah, Iran.
Farbod Ebadi Fard AzarDepartment of Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bahar KhosraviStudents Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Hossein SafariHealth Promotion Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arash ZiapourHealth Education and Health Promotion, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. arashziapoor@gmail.com.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRKermanshah University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University of Kermanshah · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen, with more vulnerabilities and less access to resources, are often seen as victims of natural disasters. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the experiences of rural women with damages resulting from an earthquake in Iran.

methodsIn this research, a qualitative approach, as well as the conventional content analysis was employed. The study population consisted of rural women residing in the earthquake-stricken areas of Sarpol-e Zahab and Salas-e Babajani counties in Kermanshah Province, Iran. Semi-structured interviews were used for data collection. Moreover, sampling was purposeful, theoretical saturation was achieved by conducting 22 interviews, and the data analysis process was performed according to the steps proposed by Graneheim and Lundman. For the strength and transferability of the research, Lincoln and Guba's Evaluative Criteria were used.

resultsThere were seven categories regarding the experiences of rural women after the earthquakes including neglecting the health needs; tension in the family and marital relations; gender inequality in the provision of assistance; feeling insecure; ignoring the ruling culture of the region; concealing needs for fear of stigmatization, and incoherent mourning as well as two categories regarding their reactions to and interaction with the earthquake consequences including positive and negative interactions.

conclusionsPaying more attention to the needs of rural women, taking the culture governing the village into account at the time of service delivery, and helping them with positive adaptations are some indispensable measures that should be taken.

Indexed as

DisastersEarthquakesRural PopulationAdultCultureDisaster VictimsFemaleGender IdentityHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIranMarriageQualitative ResearchRelief WorkSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultEarthquakeIranQualitative studyRural women

Identifiers

PMID32375725
PMCPMC7201637
OpenAlexW3022417635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.