ArticleBMC surgery2020
Formation rate of secondary anal fistula after incision and drainage of perianal Sepsis and analysis of risk factors.
Article in BMC surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05193032 (Abces After Incision), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Abces After Incision: Recurrence or Not?
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of incision and drainage procedure with drainage and ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract in the treatment of deep perianal abscess.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A randomized controlled trial of trans-intersphincteric double seton (TRISDS) for the treatment of perianal abscess.Gastroenterology report · 2025Article
- Comparison of multi-phase contrast-enhanced T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination and fat-suppressed T2-weighted combined with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in anal fistula evaluation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- No Difference in the Pathogenic Microorganisms Among Different Types of Anorectal Abscesses: A Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Enhancing surgical precision: unveiling the impact of preoperative colonoscopy in anal fistula patients.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Clinical characterization of patients with anal fistula during follow-up of anorectal abscess: a large population-based study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Observational
- Comparison of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-3D-VIBE and T1-TSE MRI in evaluating anal fistula.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe choice of surgery for perianal sepsis is currently controversial. Some people advocate one-time radical surgery for perianal sepsis, while others advocate incision and drainage. The objective of this study is to observe the formation probability of secondary anal fistula after incision and drainage in patients with perianal sepsis and determine factors that contribute to secondary anal fistula after incision and drainage.
methodsA retrospective descriptive analysis was conducted in 288 patients with perianal sepsis who were treated with anorectal surgery in the Suzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2016 to June 2018. The patients were followed by telephone, physical examination, and pelvic MRI examination for at least 1 year after surgery.
resultsThree patients were not followed, 98 patients did not receive surgical treatment or one-time radical surgery for perianal sepsis, and 187 patients were ultimately identified for the study. Anal fistula was present in 105 patients, and the rate of formation of secondary anal fistula was 56.15%. There was no statistically significant difference in the fistula formation rate between different types of sepsis (P>0.05). And, in patients with secondary anal fistula, there was no significant correlation between the location of sepsis and the type of secondary anal fistula (P>0.05).
conclusionsThe incidence of secondary anal fistula after incision and drainage of perianal sepsis is 56.15%, which is lower than the incidence found in previous study. Young is a risk factor for secondary anal fistula after incision and drainage of perianal sepsis. There is no significant correlation between the location of sepsis and the type of secondary anal fistula. Simple incision and drainage is a suitable choice for patients with acute perianal sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.