Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375720›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Relationships between health outcomes in older populations and urban green infrastructure size, quality and proximity.

Matthew Dennis, Penny A Cook, Philip James, C Philip Wheater, Sarah J Lindley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Urban Green Space and Subjective Well-Being of Older People: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew DennisDepartment of Geography, School of Environment Education and Development, University of Manchester, Arthur Lewis Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Matthew.Dennis@Manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8569-6024
Penny A CookSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, The Crescent, Allerton Building, Salford, M5 4WT, UK.
Philip JamesSchool of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, The Crescent, Peel Building, Salford, M5 4WT, UK.
C Philip WheaterSchool of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, John Dalton Building, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK.
Sarah J LindleyDepartment of Geography, School of Environment Education and Development, University of Manchester, Arthur Lewis Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council NE/N013530/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing body of literature supporting positive associations between natural environments and better health. The type, quality and quantity of green and blue space ('green-space') in proximity to the home might be particularly important for less mobile populations, such as for some older people. However, considerations of measurement and definition of green-space, beyond single aggregated metrics, are rare. This constitutes a major source of uncertainty in current understanding of public health benefits derived from natural environments. We aimed to improve our understanding of how such benefits are conferred to different demographic groups through a comprehensive evaluation of the physical and spatial characteristics of urban green infrastructure.

methodsWe employed a green infrastructure (GI) approach combining a high-resolution spatial dataset of land-cover and function with area-level demographic and socio-economic data. This allowed for a comprehensive characterization of a densely populated, polycentric city-region. We produced multiple GI attributes including, for example, urban vegetation health. We used a series of step-wise multi-level regression analyses to test associations between population chronic morbidity and the functional, physical and spatial components of GI across an urban socio-demographic gradient.

resultsGI attributes demonstrated associations with health in all socio-demographic contexts even where associations between health and overall green cover were non-significant. Associations varied by urban socio-demographic group. For areas characterised by having higher proportions of older people ('older neighbourhoods'), associations with better health were exhibited by land-cover diversity, informal greenery and patch size in high income areas and by proximity to public parks and recreation land in low income areas. Quality of GI was a significant predictor of good health in areas of low income and low GI cover. Proximity of publicly accessible GI was also significant.

conclusionsThe influence of urban GI on population health is mediated by green-space form, quantity, accessibility, and vegetation health. People in urban neighbourhoods that are characterised by lower income and older age populations are disproportionately healthy if their neighbourhoods contain accessible, good quality public green-space. This has implications for strategies to decrease health inequalities and inform international initiatives, such as the World Health Organisation's Age-Friendly Cities programme.

Indexed as

Environment DesignSocioeconomic FactorsAgedAged, 80 and overCitiesEnglandFemaleHealth StatusHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMaleMultilevel AnalysisRegression AnalysisResidence CharacteristicsSpatial AnalysisUrban Health

Identifiers

PMID32375720
PMCPMC7201616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.