Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375701›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2020

The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bi-Cheng Wang, Bo-Ya Xiao, Guo-He Lin, Chang Wang, Quentin Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evolving paradigm.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Bi-Cheng WangCancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China. bcsnowell@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4598-7721
Bo-Ya XiaoEastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200438, People's Republic of China.
Guo-He LinDepartment of Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, China.
Chang WangInstitute of Anatomy, University of Bern, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Quentin LiuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Anhui Medical University · CNSecond Military Medical University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNUnion Hospital · CNUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

the Independent Innovation Foundation of Wuhan Union Hospital 2019-109the Provincial Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Colleges KJ2017A200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInduction chemotherapy (IC) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been recommended as the first-line therapy for locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Due to the different chemotherapeutic drugs used in the IC and CCRT, the results remain controversial.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically retrieved to search potentially eligible clinical trials up to Sep 11, 2019. Eligible studies were registered and prospective randomized controlled clinical trials.

resultsFrom 526 records, nine articles including seven randomized controlled clinical trials were eligible, with a total of 2311 locoregional advanced NPC patients. IC + CCRT had significantly lower risks of death (3-year hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.89, p = 0.003; 5-year HR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.94, p = 0.01), disease progression (3-year HR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.80, p < 0.001; 5-year HR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.83, p < 0.0001), distant metastasis (3-year HR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.45-0.74, p < 0.0001; 5-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.87, p = 0.001) and locoregional relapse (3-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.95, p = 0.02; 5-year HR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.86, p = 0.002) than CCRT. Compared with CCRT, IC + CCRT showed higher relative risks of grade 3 or more neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting and hepatotoxicity throughout the course of treatment, and higher relative risks of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia and vomiting during CCRT.

conclusionIC combined with CCRT significantly improved the survival in locoregional advanced NPC patients. Moreover, toxicities were well tolerated during IC and CCRT. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the optimal induction chemotherapeutic regimen in the future.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyDisease ProgressionHumansInduction ChemotherapyNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival RateConcurrent chemoradiotherapyInduction chemotherapyMeta-analysisNasopharyngeal carcinomaSurvival

Identifiers

PMID32375701
PMCPMC7204295
OpenAlexW3023458660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.