Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375687›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Incidence of postpartum haemorrhage defined by quantitative blood loss measurement: a national cohort.

Sarah F Bell, Adam Watkins, Miriam John, Elinore Macgillivray, Thomas L Kitchen, Donna James, Cerys Scarr, Christopher M Bailey, Kevin P Kelly, Kathryn James and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Peripartum Haemorrhage: Haemostatic Aspects of the Updated Peripartum Haemorrhage Guideline of the German-Speaking Countries.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Major obstetric haemorrhage.BJA education · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. A comprehensive digital phenotype for postpartum hemorrhage.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah F BellDepartment of Anaesthetics, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Adam Watkins1000 Lives Improvement, Public Health Wales, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, UK.
Miriam JohnDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK.
Elinore Macgillivray1000 Lives Improvement, Public Health Wales, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, UK.
Thomas L KitchenDepartment of Anaesthetics, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Donna JamesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Cerys ScarrDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Christopher M BaileyDepartment of Anaesthetics, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Ysbyty Gwynedd, Bangor, UK.
Kevin P KellyDepartment of Anaesthetics, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Bodelwyddan, UK.
Kathryn JamesDepartment of Anaesthetics, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Jenna L StevensDepartment of Anaesthetics, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK.
Tracey EdeyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board, Swansea, UK.
Rachel E CollisDepartment of Anaesthetics, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Peter W CollinsInstitute of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. peter.collins@wales.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6410-1324
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBAneurin Bevan University Health Board · GBPublic Health Wales · GBBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board · GBGlan Clwyd Hospital · GBSwansea Bay University Health Board · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

Welsh Government NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisual estimation of blood loss following delivery often under-reports actual bleed volume. To improve accuracy, quantitative blood loss measurement was introduced for all births in the 12 hospitals providing maternity care in Wales. This intervention was incorporated into a quality improvement programme (Obstetric Bleeding Strategy for Wales, OBS Cymru). We report the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage in Wales over a 1-year period using quantitative measurement.

methodsThis prospective, consecutive cohort included all 31,341 women giving birth in Wales in 2017. Standardised training was cascaded to maternity staff in all 12 hospitals in Wales. The training comprised mock-scenarios, a video and team drills. Uptake of quantitative blood loss measurement was audited at each centre. Data on postpartum haemorrhage of > 1000 mL were collected and analysed according to mode of delivery. Data on blood loss for all maternities was from the NHS Wales Informatics Service.

resultsBiannual audit data demonstrated an increase in quantitative measurement from 52.1 to 87.8% (P < 0.001). The incidence (95% confidence intervals, CI) of postpartum haemorrhage of > 1000 mL, > 1500 mL and > 2000 mL was 8.6% (8.3 to 8.9), 3.3% (3.1 to 3.5) and 1.3% (1.2 to 1.4), respectively compared to 5%, 2% and 0.8% in the year before OBS Cymru. The incidence (95% CI) of bleeds of > 1000 mL was similar across the 12 hospitals despite widely varied size, staffing levels and case mix, median (25th to 75th centile) 8.6% (7.8-9.6). The incidence of PPH varied with mode of delivery and was mean (95% CI) 4.9% (4.6-5.2) for unassisted vaginal deliveries, 18.4 (17.1-19.8) for instrumental vaginal deliveries, 8.5 (7.7-9.4) for elective caesarean section and 19.8 (18.6-21.0) for non-elective caesarean sections.

conclusionsQuantitative measurement of blood loss is feasible in all hospitals providing maternity care and is associated with detection of higher rates of postpartum haemorrhage. These results have implications for the definition of abnormal blood loss after childbirth and for management and research of postpartum haemorrhage.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansIncidencePostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyProspective StudiesWalesEpidemiologyHaemorrhageIncidenceMeasured blood lossPostpartum

Identifiers

PMID32375687
PMCPMC7201938
OpenAlexW3023199226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.