Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375668›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

The construction of a conceptual framework explaining the relation between barriers to change of management of neuropsychiatric symptoms in nursing homes: a qualitative study using focus groups.

Charlotte F van Teunenbroek, Kim Verhagen, Martin Smalbrugge, Anke Persoon, Sytse U Zuidema, Debby L Gerritsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte F van TeunenbroekDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, HPC FA21, the Netherlands. c.f.van.teunenbroek@umcg.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-5432-0593
Kim VerhagenDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, HPC FA21, the Netherlands.
Martin SmalbruggeDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anke PersoonRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Alzheimer Centre, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Sytse U ZuidemaDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, HPC FA21, the Netherlands.
Debby L GerritsenRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Alzheimer Centre, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral efforts have been made to change management of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in nursing homes, however only few were successful. Numerous barriers to change in healthcare were identified, yet only one conceptual model is known to study their interrelationships. Unfortunately, this model does not discuss specific barriers encountered in nursing home practice. The aim of this study is to explore perceived barriers to change in the management of NPS in nursing homes and to construct a conceptual framework providing insight into the relative importance and interrelationships of these barriers when improving quality of care.

methodsFour focus groups were conducted in different dementia special care units of one Dutch nursing home. Participants were either nursing staff, treatment staff or relatives of residents. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted according to the five phases defined by Braun & Clarke. Finally, a conceptual framework showing the interrelations of barrier-themes was constructed using text fragments of the focus groups.

resultsWe constructed a conceptual framework consisting of eight themes of barriers explaining the extent to which change in NPS-management can be achieved: 'organizational barriers', 'personal barriers', 'deficiency of staff knowledge', 'suboptimal communication', 'inadequate (multidisciplinary) collaboration', 'disorganization of processes', 'reactive coping' and 'differences in perception'. Addressing 'organizational barriers' and 'deficiency of staff knowledge' is a precondition for change. 'Suboptimal communication' and 'inadequate (multidisciplinary) collaboration' play a key role in the extent of change achieved via the themes 'differences in perception' and 'disorganization of processes'. Furthermore, 'personal barriers' influence all themes - except 'organizational barriers' - and may cause 'reactive coping', which in turn may lead to 'difficulties to structure processes'.

conclusionsA conceptual framework was created explaining the relationships between barriers towards achieving change focused on improving management of NPS in nursing homes. After this framework has been confirmed and refined in additional research, it can be used to study the interrelatedness of barriers to change, and to determine the importance of addressing them for achieving change in the provided care.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersNursing StaffFocus GroupsHumansNursing HomesQualitative ResearchBarriers to changeExtent of changeFocus groupsIntercollegiate relationsNursing homesQualitative researchQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID32375668
PMCPMC7201759
OpenAlexW3021535930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.