Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375667›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Maternal pre and perinatal experiences with their full-term, preterm and very preterm newborns.

Joana L Gonçalves, Marina Fuertes, Maria João Alves, Sandra Antunes, Ana Rita Almeida, Rute Casimiro, Margarida Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joana L GonçalvesCenter for Psychology at University of Porto (CPUP), Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal. joanaglopes@gmail.com.
Marina FuertesCenter for Psychology at University of Porto (CPUP), Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.
Maria João AlvesCenter for Psychology at University of Porto (CPUP), Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.
Sandra AntunesSchool of Health Technology, Polytechnic Institute of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Rita AlmeidaLisbon School of Education/CIED, Polytechnic Institute of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Rute CasimiroLisbon School of Education/CIED, Polytechnic Institute of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Margarida SantosSchool of Health Technology, Polytechnic Institute of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/MHC-PED/1424/2014Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/90853/2012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMothers' reports about pregnancy, maternity and their experiences during the perinatal period have been associated with infants' later quality of attachment and development. Yet, there has been little research with mothers of very preterm newborns. This study aimed to explore mothers' experiences related to pregnancy, premature birth, relationship with the newborn, and future perspectives, and to compare them in the context of distinct infants' at-birth-risk conditions.

methodsA semi-structured interview was conducted with women after birth, within the first 72 h of the newborn's life. A total of 150 women participated and were divided in three groups: (1) 50 mothers of full-term newborns (Gestational Age (GA) ≥ 37 weeks; FT), (2) 50 mothers of preterm newborns (GA 32-36 weeks; PT) and (3) 50 mothers of very preterm newborns (GA < 32 weeks; VPT).

resultsMothers of full-term infants responded more often that their children were calm and that they did not expect difficulties in taking care of and providing for the baby. Mothers of preterm newborns although having planned and accepted well the pregnancy (with no mixed or ambivalent feelings about it) and while being optimistic about their competence to take care of the baby, mentioned feeling frightened because of the unexpected occurrence of a premature birth and its associated risks. Mothers of very preterm newborns reported more negative and distressful feelings while showing more difficulties in anticipating the experience of caring for their babies.

conclusionThe results indicate that Health Care Systems and Neonatal Care Policy should provide differentiated psychological support and responses to mothers, babies and families, taking into account the newborns' GA and neonatal risk factors.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleMother-Child RelationsMothersParturitionPregnancyPremature BirthBirthMaternal representationsPostpartumPregnancyPrematurity

Identifiers

PMID32375667
PMCPMC7204281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.