Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375376›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Healthcare Providers' Knowledge and Attitude Towards Abortions in Thailand: A Pre-Post Evaluation of Trainings on Safe Abortion.

Rugsapon Sanitya, Aniqa Islam Marshall, Nithiwat Saengruang, Sataporn Julchoo, Pigunkaew Sinam, Rapeepong Suphanchaimat, Mathudara Phaiyarom, Viroj Tangcharoensathien, Nongluk Boonthai, Kamheang Chaturachinda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Relegated Goal of Health Institutions: Sexual and Reproductive Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rugsapon SanityaInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Aniqa Islam MarshallInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6575-731X
Nithiwat SaengruangInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Sataporn JulchooInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Pigunkaew SinamInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Rapeepong SuphanchaimatInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Mathudara PhaiyaromInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1156-1984
Viroj TangcharoensathienInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Nongluk BoonthaiWomen's Health and Reproductive Right and Foundation of Thailand, Bangkok 10210, Thailand.
Kamheang ChaturachindaWomen's Health and Reproductive Right and Foundation of Thailand, Bangkok 10210, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although physicians in Thailand can carry out abortions legally, unsafe abortion rates remain high and have serious consequences for women's health. Training programs for healthcare providers on the 'Care of unplanned and adolescent pregnancies for the prevention of unsafe abortions' have been implemented in Thailand with the aim of providing information and challenging negative attitudes about abortions. This study investigated the participants of the training courses in order to: (i) evaluate their knowledge and attitudes towards safe abortions; and (ii) investigate the factors that determine their knowledge and attitudes. A pre-post study design was applied. Descriptive statistics were calculated to provide an overview of the data. Bivariate analysis, a Wilcoxon signed rank test and a multivariable analysis using multiple linear regression were applied to determine the changes in attitudes and assess the likelihood of behaviour change towards adolescents and women experiencing unplanned pregnancy and abortions, according to demographic and professional characteristics. Having had the training, healthcare providers' change in attitudes towards adolescents and women experiencing unplanned pregnancies and abortions were found to be 0.67 points for the nine responses of attitudes and 0.79 points for the 14 responses on various abortion scenarios. Changes in attitude were significantly different among the varying health professional types, with non-doctors increasing by 0.53 points, non-obstetricians and non-gynaecologists increasing by 0.46 points and obstetricians and gynaecologists (OBGYN) increasing by 0.32 points. Positive attitudes towards unplanned pregnancies and unsafe abortions and attitudes towards abortion scenarios significantly increased. The career type of the health professional was a significant factor in improving attitudes. The training program was more effective among non-doctor healthcare providers. Therefore, non-doctors could be the target population for training in the future.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyThailandWomen's HealthYoung Adultabortionhealth professionalspre-post evaluationThailandtrainingunplanned pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID32375376
PMCPMC7246465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.