Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375366›Full record

ArticleGenes2020

Ancestry Prediction Comparisons of Different AISNPs for Five Continental Populations and Population Structure Dissection of the Xinjiang Hui Group via a Self-Developed Panel.

Xiao-Ye Jin, Yu-Xin Guo, Chong Chen, Wei Cui, Yan-Fang Liu, Yun-Chun Tai, Bo-Feng Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao-Ye JinKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Yu-Xin GuoKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Chong ChenKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Wei CuiKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Yan-Fang LiuMulti-Omics Innovative Research Center of Forensic Identification; Department of Forensic Genetics, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Yun-Chun TaiMulti-Omics Innovative Research Center of Forensic Identification; Department of Forensic Genetics, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Bo-Feng ZhuKey Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancestry informative markers are genetic markers that show distinct genetic divergences among different populations. These markers can be utilized to discern population substructures and estimate the ancestral origins of unknown individuals. Previously, we developed a multiplex system of 30 ancestry informative single nucleotide polymorphism (AISNP) loci to facilitate ancestral inferences in different continental populations. In the current study, we first compared the ancestry resolutions of the 30 AISNPs and the other previously reported AISNP panels for African, European, East Asian, South Asian and American populations. Next, the genetic components of the Xinjiang Hui group were further explored in comparison to these continental populations based on the 30 AISNPs. Genetic divergence analyses of the 30 AISNPs in these five continental populations revealed that most of the AISNPs showed high genetic differentiations between these populations. Ancestry analysis comparisons of the 30 AISNPs and other published AISNPs revealed that these 30 AISNPs had comparable efficiency to other AISNP panels. Genetic relationship analyses among the studied Hui group and other continental populations demonstrated that the Hui group had close genetic affinities with East Asian populations and might share the genetic ancestries with East Asian populations. Overall, the 30 AISNPs can be used to predict the bio-geographical origins of different continental populations. Moreover, the obtained genetic data of 30 AISNPs in the Hui group can further enrich the extant reference data, which can be used as reference data for ancestry analyses of the Hui group.

Indexed as

Gene FlowGenetic MarkersPolymorphism, Single NucleotideChinaDNAEthnicityGene LibraryHuman MigrationHumansMinority GroupsPhylogenyRacial GroupsDNAGenetic Markersancestry informative markersbio-geographical originsforensicsHuiSNP

Identifiers

PMID32375366
PMCPMC7288656
OpenAlexW3022335391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.