Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375363›Full record

ReviewPolymers2020

X-ray-Based Spectroscopic Techniques for Characterization of Polymer Nanocomposite Materials at a Molecular Level.

Dongwan Son, Sangho Cho, Jieun Nam, Hoik Lee, Myungwoong Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dongwan SonDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea.
Sangho ChoMaterials Architecturing Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 02792, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9627-5310
Jieun NamDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea.
Hoik LeeResearch Institute of Industrial Technology Convergence, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Ansan 15588, Korea.
Myungwoong KimDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0611-8694

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides detailed fundamental principles of X-ray-based characterization methods, i.e., X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure, and the development of different techniques based on the principles to gain deeper understandings of chemical structures in polymeric materials. Qualitative and quantitative analyses enable obtaining chemical compositions including the relative and absolute concentrations of specific elements and chemical bonds near the surface of or deep inside the material of interest. More importantly, these techniques help us to access the interface of a polymer and a solid material at a molecular level in a polymer nanocomposite. The collective interpretation of all this information leads us to a better understanding of why specific material properties can be modulated in composite geometry. Finally, we will highlight the impacts of the use of these spectroscopic methods in recent advances in polymer nanocomposite materials for various nano- and bio-applications.

Indexed as

energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopypolymer nanocompositequalitative analysisquantitative analysisX-ray absorption spectroscopyX-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID32375363
PMCPMC7284789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.