Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375222›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2020

Automatic Recognition of Personality Profiles Using EEG Functional Connectivity During Emotional Processing.

Manousos A Klados, Panagiota Konstantinidi, Rosalia Dacosta-Aguayo, Vasiliki-Despoina Kostaridou, Alessandro Vinciarelli, Michalis Zervakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Cross subject personality assessment based on electroencephalogram functional connectivity and domain adaptation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Brain Activity during Different Throwing Games: EEG Exploratory Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manousos A KladosDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, International Faculty, CITY College, Thessaloniki 54453, Greece.
Panagiota KonstantinidiSchool of Life and Health Science, Aston University, Birmingham 30511, UK.
Rosalia Dacosta-AguayoDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, The University of Barcelona, 731 33 Barcelona, Spain.
Vasiliki-Despoina KostaridouSchool of Life and Health Science, Aston University, Birmingham 30511, UK.
Alessandro VinciarelliSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Michalis ZervakisDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Chania 73100, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personality is the characteristic set of an individual's behavioral and emotional patterns that evolve from biological and environmental factors. The recognition of personality profiles is crucial in making human-computer interaction (HCI) applications realistic, more focused, and user friendly. The ability to recognize personality using neuroscientific data underpins the neurobiological basis of personality. This paper aims to automatically recognize personality, combining scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) and machine learning techniques. As the resting state EEG has not so far been proven efficient for predicting personality, we used EEG recordings elicited during emotion processing. This study was based on data from the AMIGOS dataset reflecting the response of 37 healthy participants. Brain networks and graph theoretical parameters were extracted from cleaned EEG signals, while each trait score was dichotomized into low- and high-level using the k-means algorithm. A feature selection algorithm was used afterwards to reduce the feature-set size to the best 10 features to describe each trait separately. Support vector machines (SVM) were finally employed to classify each instance. Our method achieved a classification accuracy of 83.8% for extraversion, 86.5% for agreeableness, 83.8% for conscientiousness, 83.8% for neuroticism, and 73% for openness.

Indexed as

Big-Five factor modelbrain functional connectivityelectroencephalogram signal processingemotional processingneurosciencepersonality detection

Identifiers

PMID32375222
PMCPMC7288068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.