Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375210›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2020

Ana M S Guimaraes, Cristina K Zimpel

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Discrimination betweenOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. First report of whole genome sequence of a Mycobacterium bovis (3/86Rv) strain isolated from a cow in India.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emergence ofFrontiers in public health · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Radiology case reports · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Population structure and history ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. InsideFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Genomic comparison betweenFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  18. Whole genome sequencing improves the discrimination betweenOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana M S GuimaraesLaboratory of Applied Research in Mycobacteria, Department of Microbiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, SP, Brazil.
Cristina K ZimpelLaboratory of Applied Research in Mycobacteria, Department of Microbiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 1721455Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2016/26108-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/04617-3Morris Animal Foundation D17ZO-307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

bovine tuberculosisgenomicsgenotypingMycobacterium bovisWGS

Identifiers

PMID32375210
PMCPMC7285088
OpenAlexW3021216493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.