Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375208›Full record

ArticleIntestinal research2021

The role of platelet to lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in ulcerative colitis.

Yujin Jeong, Seong Ran Jeon, Hyun Gun Kim, Jung Rock Moon, Tae Hee Lee, Jae Young Jang, Jun-Hyung Cho, Jun Seok Park, Heesu Park, Ki-Hun Lee and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intestinal research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yujin JeongDigestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seong Ran JeonDigestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hyun Gun KimDigestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jung Rock MoonDigestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Tae Hee LeeDigestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Young JangDigestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jun-Hyung ChoDigestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jun Seok ParkDigestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Heesu ParkDigestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ki-Hun LeeDigestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin-Oh KimDigestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Joon Seong LeeDigestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Bong Min KoDigestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Suyeon ParkDepartment of Biostatistics, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Soonchunhyang University · KR

Funding

Soonchunhyang University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsNeutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) can serve as biomarkers for diagnosing and assessing disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). We investigated their clinical significance in UC.

methodsWe analyzed 48 patients with UC who underwent measurement of fecal calprotectin (FC) and endoscopy and 96 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. NLR and PLR were compared between the patients and healthy controls. The endoscopic activity was divided into 2 groups: group 1 (mild to moderate inflammation) and group 2 (severe inflammation) according to the Mayo endoscopic subscore in UC.

resultsTo diagnose UC, the optimal cutoff of NLR and PLR was 2.26 (sensitivity 54.2%; specificity 90.6%; positive likelihood ratio 5.778, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.944-11.339; area under the curve [AUC] 0.774, 95% CI, 0.690-0.859) and 179.8 (sensitivity 35.4%; specificity 90.6%; positive likelihood ratio 3.778, 95% CI 1.821-7.838; AUC 0.654, 95% CI 0.556-0.753), respectively. The optimal cutoff to differentiate group 1 and group 2 was 3.44, 175.9, and 453 µg/g for NLR, PLR, and FC, respectively (sensitivity, 63.6% vs. 90.9% vs. 81.8%; specificity, 81.1% vs. 78.4% vs. 73.0%; positive likelihood ratio, 3.364 vs. 4.205 vs. 3.027; AUC, 0.714 vs. 0.897 vs. 0.813). PLR had the highest AUC and positive likelihood ratio.

conclusionsNLR and PLR help differentiate patients with UC from healthy controls. NLR, PLR, and FC indicate endoscopic activity and may reflect intestinal mucosal conditions.

Indexed as

Colitis, ulcerativeFecal calprotectinNeutrophil to lymphocyte ratioPlatelet to lymphocyte ratio

Identifiers

PMID32375208
PMCPMC7873407
OpenAlexW3021607198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.