Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32375162›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2021

Differentiating esophageal sensitivity phenotypes using pH-impedance in intensive care unit infants referred for gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

Sudarshan R Jadcherla, Zakia Sultana, Kathryn A Hasenstab-Kenney, Varsha Prabhakar, Ish K Gulati, Carlo Di Lorenzo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sudarshan R JadcherlaThe Neonatal and Infant Feeding Disorders Program, Center for Perinatal Research, Abigal Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. Sudarshan.Jadcherla@nationwidechildrens.org.
Zakia SultanaThe Neonatal and Infant Feeding Disorders Program, Center for Perinatal Research, Abigal Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kathryn A Hasenstab-KenneyThe Neonatal and Infant Feeding Disorders Program, Center for Perinatal Research, Abigal Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Varsha PrabhakarThe Neonatal and Infant Feeding Disorders Program, Center for Perinatal Research, Abigal Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ish K GulatiThe Neonatal and Infant Feeding Disorders Program, Center for Perinatal Research, Abigal Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Carlo Di LorenzoPediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Nationwide Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Pathophysiology of Aerodigestive Reflexes in InfantsR01DK068158 · NIDDK · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI JADCHERLA, SUDARSHAN R · 2006 to 2016
$3.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK068158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo identify esophageal sensitivity phenotypes relative to acid (S

methodsSymptomatic infants (N = 279) were evaluated for GERD at 42 (40-45) weeks postmenstrual age using 24-h pH-impedance. Symptom-associated probability (SAP) for acid and bolus components defined esophageal sensitivity: (1) S

resultsEsophageal sensitivity prevalence (S

conclusionsFeeding and breathing methods can influence the frequency and type of aerodigestive symptoms. We differentiated esophageal sensitivity phenotypes in NICU infants referred for GERD symptoms using pH-impedance. Acid sensitivity alone was rare, which may explain poor response to acid suppressives; aerodigestive symptoms were predominantly linked with bolus spread. Magnitude of esophageal acid exposure and esophageal sensitivity to bolus spread may explain the pathophysiological basis for symptoms. IMPACT: Objective GERD diagnosis and reasons for symptoms in NICU infants remains unclear. Differentiation of esophageal sensitivities by acid and bolus components of GER reveal distinct symptom profiles, specifically the bolus component of GER significantly contributes to symptom occurrence. Acid only sensitivity to GER is rare, and acid-suppressive therapy alone may not improve symptoms in a majority of NICU infants. Magnitude of esophageal acid exposure and esophageal sensitivity to any bolus spread may explain the pathophysiological basis for symptoms. Feeding and breathing methods can influence the frequency and type of aerodigestive symptoms. GERD treatments should be individualized to the patient's GERD phenotype and likely also target the bolus component of GER.

Indexed as

CoughCritical CareElectric ImpedanceEnteral NutritionEsophagusFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationInfantInfant, PrematureIntensive Care UnitsIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleMultivariate AnalysisPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID32375162
PMCPMC7644596
OpenAlexW3020910847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.