ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021
Infectious Diseases Society of America Position Paper: Recommended Revisions to the National Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) Sepsis Quality Measure.
Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05968287 (Evaluation of the Relationship of Neutrophil Functions With Sepsis and Septic Shock Using the Leukocyte ImmunoTest™ in Patients With Various Infectious Conditions), which is not on this map. Cited by 97 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Relationship of Neutrophil Functions With Sepsis and Septic Shock Using the Leukocyte ImmunoTest™ in Patients With Various Infectious Conditions
Who cites it
97 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 200 citations in OpenAlex.
- Balanced crystalloid versus saline for resuscitation in adult sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The Effect of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) Compliance and Implementation on Mortality Among Patients With Sepsis : A Systematic Review.Annals of internal medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Fluid resuscitation in adults with severe infection and sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Early management of adult sepsis and septic shock: Korean clinical practice guidelines.Acute and critical care · 2024Guideline
- Utility of shaking chills as a diagnostic sign for bacteremia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of an Emergency Department Code Sepsis Protocol: A Pragmatic Clinical Trial.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Trial
- Comorbidities, Weight-Based Initial Fluid Resuscitation, and Mortality in Patients With Sepsis.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Article
- Diagnostic Value of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Combined With Lactate for Early Detection of Sepsis in Prehospital Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Advancing Antimicrobial Stewardship With Diagnostic Excellence: The Role of Bayesian Reasoning.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Antibiotic timing and progression to sepsis among patients in the ED for infection.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- The Global Impact of Sepsis: Epidemiology, Recognition, Management, and Health System Challenges.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Physician Variation in Early Sepsis Management.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Are SEP-1 and blood culture stewardship at odds? Retrospective review of SEP-1 failures pre- and during a blood culture bottle shortage.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2026Article
- Optimal timing of antibiotics administration for sepsis or septic shock in the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Regional Adherence to Early Sepsis Management Bundle and Associated Mortality in Hong Kong Between 2009-2018.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Pre-Referral Antibiotics and Mortality Among Adults With Sepsis in Southeast Asia: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study.Critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of an AI-based blood testing device for diagnosis and prognosis of acute infection and sepsis.Nature medicine · 2025Observational
- β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations in Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury and Renal Replacement Therapy.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Optimal antibiotic use in the intensive care unit.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) measure has appropriately established sepsis as a national priority. However, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA and five additional endorsing societies) is concerned about SEP-1's potential to drive antibiotic overuse because it does not account for the high rate of sepsis overdiagnosis and encourages aggressive antibiotics for all patients with possible sepsis, regardless of the certainty of diagnosis or severity of illness. IDSA is also concerned that SEP-1's complex "time zero" definition is not evidence-based and is prone to inter-observer variation. In this position paper, IDSA outlines several recommendations aimed at reducing the risk of unintended consequences of SEP-1 while maintaining focus on its evidence-based elements. IDSA's core recommendation is to limit SEP-1 to septic shock, for which the evidence supporting the benefit of immediate antibiotics is greatest. Prompt empiric antibiotics are often appropriate for suspected sepsis without shock, but IDSA believes there is too much heterogeneity and difficulty defining this population, uncertainty about the presence of infection, and insufficient data on the necessity of immediate antibiotics to support a mandatory treatment standard for all patients in this category. IDSA believes guidance on managing possible sepsis without shock is more appropriate for guidelines that can delineate the strengths and limitations of supporting evidence and allow clinicians discretion in applying specific recommendations to individual patients. Removing sepsis without shock from SEP-1 will mitigate the risk of unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for noninfectious syndromes, simplify data abstraction, increase measure reliability, and focus attention on the population most likely to benefit from immediate empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.