Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32374763›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Engineering a 3D in vitro model of human skeletal muscle at the single fiber scale.

Anna Urciuolo, Elena Serena, Rusha Ghua, Susi Zatti, Monica Giomo, Nicolò Mattei, Massimo Vetralla, Giulia Selmin, Camilla Luni, Nicola Vitulo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Three-dimensionalNeural regeneration research · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna UrciuoloIndustrial Engineering Department, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Elena SerenaIndustrial Engineering Department, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Rusha GhuaDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Susi ZattiIndustrial Engineering Department, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Monica GiomoIndustrial Engineering Department, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Nicolò MatteiIndustrial Engineering Department, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Massimo VetrallaIndustrial Engineering Department, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Giulia SelminIndustrial Engineering Department, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Camilla LuniShanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Nicola VituloDepartment of Biotechnologies, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giorgio ValleDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4377-5685
Libero VitielloDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0017-0838
Nicola ElvassoreIndustrial Engineering Department, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
University of Padua · ITShanghaiTech University · CNUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reproduction of reliable in vitro models of human skeletal muscle is made harder by the intrinsic 3D structural complexity of this tissue. Here we coupled engineered hydrogel with 3D structural cues and specific mechanical properties to derive human 3D muscle constructs ("myobundles") at the scale of single fibers, by using primary myoblasts or myoblasts derived from embryonic stem cells. To this aim, cell culture was performed in confined, laminin-coated micrometric channels obtained inside a 3D hydrogel characterized by the optimal stiffness for skeletal muscle myogenesis. Primary myoblasts cultured in our 3D culture system were able to undergo myotube differentiation and maturation, as demonstrated by the proper expression and localization of key components of the sarcomere and sarcolemma. Such approach allowed the generation of human myobundles of ~10 mm in length and ~120 μm in diameter, showing spontaneous contraction 7 days after cell seeding. Transcriptome analyses showed higher similarity between 3D myobundles and skeletal signature, compared to that found between 2D myotubes and skeletal muscle, mainly resulting from expression in 3D myobundles of categories of genes involved in skeletal muscle maturation, including extracellular matrix organization. Moreover, imaging analyses confirmed that structured 3D culture system was conducive to differentiation/maturation also when using myoblasts derived from embryonic stem cells. In conclusion, our structured 3D model is a promising tool for modelling human skeletal muscle in healthy and diseases conditions.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesTissue EngineeringAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedDimethylpolysiloxanesHumansHydrogelsMaterials TestingMiceModels, BiologicalMolecular ConformationMuscle DevelopmentMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalMyoblastsbaysilonDimethylpolysiloxanesHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID32374763
PMCPMC7202609
OpenAlexW3021564975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.