Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32374755›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

Prediction of outcome in patients with ARDS: A prospective cohort study comparing ARDS-definitions and other ARDS-associated parameters, ratios and scores at intubation and over time.

Wolfgang Huber, Michael Findeisen, Tobias Lahmer, Alexander Herner, Sebastian Rasch, Ulrich Mayr, Petra Hoppmann, Juliane Jaitner, Rainer Okrojek, Franz Brettner and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Incidence, Predictive Factors, and Impact on Mortality.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Prognostication using SpOJournal of critical care · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wolfgang HuberMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9086-7908
Michael FindeisenKlinik für Pneumologie, Gastroenterologie, Internistische Intensiv- und Beatmungsmedizin, München Klinik Harlaching, München, Germany.
Tobias LahmerMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany.
Alexander HernerMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany.
Sebastian RaschMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany.
Ulrich MayrMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany.
Petra HoppmannMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany.
Juliane JaitnerMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany.
Rainer OkrojekMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany.
Franz BrettnerAbteilung Intensivmedizin, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, München, Germany.
Roland SchmidMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany.
Paul SchmidleMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly recognition of high-risk-patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) might improve their outcome by less protracted allocation to intensified therapy including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Among numerous predictors and classifications, the American European Consensus Conferenece (AECC)- and Berlin-definitions as well as the oxygenation index (OI) and the Murray-/Lung Injury Score are the most common. Most studies compared the prediction of mortality by these parameters on the day of intubation and/or diagnosis of ARDS. However, only few studies investigated prediction over time, in particular for more than three days.

objectiveTherefore, our study aimed at characterization of the best predictor and the best day(s) to predict 28-days-mortality within four days after intubation of patients with ARDS.

methodsIn 100 consecutive patients with ARDS severity according to OI (mean airway pressure*FiO2/paO2), modified Murray-score without radiological points (Murray_mod), AECC- and Berlin-definition, were daily documented for four days after intubation. In the subgroup of 49 patients with transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) monitoring (PiCCO), extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) was measured daily. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Prediction of 28-days-mortality (Area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (ROC-AUC)); IBM SPSS 26.

resultsIn the totality of patients the best prediction of 28-days-mortality was found on day-1 and day-2 (mean ROC-AUCs for all predictors/scores: 0.632 and 0.620). OI was the best predictor among the ARDS-scores (AUC=0.689 on day-1; 4-day-mean AUC = 0.625). AECC and Murray_mod had 4-day-means AUCs below 0.6. Among the 49 patients with TPTD, EVLWI (4-day-mean AUC=0.696) and OI (4-day-mean AUC=0.695) were the best predictors. AUCs were 0.789 for OI on day-1, and 0.786 for EVLWI on day-2. In binary regression analysis of patients with TPTD, EVLWI (B=-0.105; Wald=7.294; p=0.007) and OI (B=0.124; Wald=7.435; p=0.006) were independently associated with 28-days-mortality. Combining of EVLWI and OI provided ROC-AUCs of 0.801 (day-1) and 0.824 (day-2). Among the totality of patients, the use of TPTD-monitoring "per se" and a lower SOFA-score were independently associated with a lower 28-days-mortality.

conclusionsPrognosis of ARDS-patients can be estblished within two days after intubation. The best predictors were EVLWI and OI and their combination. TPTD-monitoring "per se" was independently associated with reduced mortality.

Indexed as

Extravascular Lung WaterOxygen ConsumptionAgedAPACHEArea Under CurveExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleGermanyHospitals, UniversityHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32374755
PMCPMC7202606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.