Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32374631›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2020

Personalized Network Modeling of the Pan-Cancer Patient and Cell Line Interactome.

Rupam Bhattacharyya, Min Jin Ha, Qingzhi Liu, Rehan Akbani, Han Liang, Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rupam BhattacharyyaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Min Jin HaDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Qingzhi LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Rehan AkbaniDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Han LiangDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Veerabhadran BaladandayuthapaniDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Alexey I Nesvizhskii · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS--SPORE IN LUNG CANCERP50CA070907 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI HEYMACH, JOHN V., MINNA, JOHN D. · 1996 to 2024
$57.4M
University of Texas PDX Development and Trial CenterU54CA224065 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MERIC-BERNSTAM, FUNDA, ROTH, JACK · 2017 to 2022
$7.7M
TCPA: an Integrated Bioinformatics Resource for Functional Cancer Proteomic DataU24CA209851 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LIANG, HAN, MILLS, GORDON B. · 2016 to 2020
$4.0M
Integrative bioinformatics and functional characterization of oncogenic driver aberrations in cancerU01CA217842 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DENEEN, BENJAMIN, MILLS, GORDON B. · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
Graph-based Bayesian analysis of Genomics and Proteomics DataR01CA194391 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN, MALLICK, BANI K · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Integrated analysis of protein expression data from the Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA) platformU24CA210950 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI AKBANI, REHAN, MILLS, GORDON B. · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Systematic Functional Characterization of RNA Editing in Endometrial CancerR01CA175486 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LIANG, HAN · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Integrative methods for high-dimensional genomics dataR01CA160736 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.4M
Proteomic-based integrated subject-specific networks in cancerR21CA220299 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN, HA, MIN JIN · 2018 to 2019
$378k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS P50 CA070907NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160736NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175486NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194391NCI NIH HHS R21 CA220299NCI NIH HHS U01 CA217842NCI NIH HHS U24 CA209851NCI NIH HHS U24 CA210950NCI NIH HHS U54 CA224065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePersonalized network inference on diverse clinical and in vitro model systems across cancer types can be used to delineate specific regulatory mechanisms, uncover drug targets and pathways, and develop individualized predictive models in cancer.

methodsWe developed TransPRECISE (personalized cancer-specific integrated network estimation model), a multiscale Bayesian network modeling framework, to analyze the pan-cancer patient and cell line interactome to identify differential and conserved intrapathway activities, to globally assess cell lines as representative models for patients, and to develop drug sensitivity prediction models. We assessed pan-cancer pathway activities for a large cohort of patient samples (> 7,700) from the Cancer Proteome Atlas across ≥ 30 tumor types, a set of 640 cancer cell lines from the MD Anderson Cell Lines Project spanning 16 lineages, and ≥ 250 cell lines' response to > 400 drugs.

resultsTransPRECISE captured differential and conserved proteomic network topologies and pathway circuitry between multiple patient and cell line lineages: ovarian and kidney cancers shared high levels of connectivity in the hormone receptor and receptor tyrosine kinase pathways, respectively, between the two model systems. Our tumor stratification approach found distinct clinical subtypes of the patients represented by different sets of cell lines: patients with head and neck tumors were classified into two different subtypes that are represented by head and neck and esophagus cell lines and had different prognostic patterns (456

conclusionOur study provides a generalizable analytic framework to assess the translational potential of preclinical model systems and to guide pathway-based personalized medical decision making, integrating genomic and molecular data across model systems.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsProteomicsBayes TheoremCell LineGenomicsHumans

Identifiers

PMID32374631
PMCPMC7265783
OpenAlexW3021499551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.