Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32374576›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in organ transplantation2020

The aging transplant population and immunobiology: any therapeutic implication?

Joanna Schaenman, Deena Goldwater

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in organ transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna SchaenmanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases.
Deena GoldwaterDepartment of Medicine, Divisions of Geriatrics and Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Office of Infectious Diseases · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Evaluation of Epigenetic Markers of Biologic Age to Predict Adverse Outcomes after TransplantationR21AG055879 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SCHAENMAN, JOANNA M · 2018 to 2019
$429k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG055879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe aim of this review is to describe the latest investigations into the immunobiology of aging and the potential impact on outcomes after mechanical circulatory support implantation and heart transplantation. This information is relevant given the growing numbers of older patients with heart failure undergoing evaluation for mechanical circulatory support device (MCSD) or heart transplantation. RECENT

findingsA host of aging-associated aspects of immune dysfunction have been described in the general population including T-cell senescence, exhaustion, and terminal dedifferentiation, as well as impaired function of innate immune cells. Another important consequence of T-cell senescence is inflammation, which is known to have a strong relationship with both heart failure and frailty in older patients. Recent data on the association between T-cell and monocyte phenotypes as well as evaluation of gene expression and adverse outcomes after MCSD suggests the potential value of immunologic assessment of MCSD and heart transplant candidates and recipients. Measurement of physical frailty represents another avenue for patient evaluation that may complement immunologic assessment. Determination of immune dysfunction and frailty prior to transplantation may have implications for choice of induction and dosing of maintenance immunosuppression. SUMMARY: As the age of transplant and MCSD candidates and recipients continues to increase, it is important for providers to recognize the potential impact of aging-associated immune dysfunction and how it may influence candidate selection, postintervention monitoring, and adjustment of immunosuppression.

Indexed as

AgedAgingHumansTransplants

Identifiers

PMID32374576
PMCPMC9366898
OpenAlexW3022661539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.