Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32374408›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020

Development and validation of phenotype classifiers across multiple sites in the observational health data sciences and informatics network.

Mehr Kashyap, Martin Seneviratne, Juan M Banda, Thomas Falconer, Borim Ryu, Sooyoung Yoo, George Hripcsak, Nigam H Shah

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Research Informatics: a Decade-in-Review.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Machine learning approaches for electronic health records phenotyping: a methodical review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Classifying Infection Risk Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022
    Article
  16. Key Contributions in Clinical Research Informatics.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2021
    Review
  17. ACE: the Advanced Cohort Engine for searching longitudinal patient records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mehr KashyapStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Martin SeneviratneStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Juan M BandaStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Thomas FalconerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Borim RyuOffice of eHealth and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Sooyoung YooOffice of eHealth and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
George HripcsakDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Nigam H ShahStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

Funding

DISCOVERING AND APPLYING KNOWLEDGE IN CLINICAL DATABASESR01LM006910 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HRIPCSAK, GEORGE M · 2000 to 2023
$10.6M
Methods for generalized ontology terms enrichment analysisR01LM011369 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAH, NIGAM H · 2013 to 2020
$5.0M
Stanford Medicine Center for Longevity and Healthy Aging Research Education CoreP30AG059307 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PERIYAKOIL, VYJEYANTHI S, YESAVAGE, JEROME A · 2018 to 2025
$4.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG059307NLM NIH HHS R01 LM006910NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAccurate electronic phenotyping is essential to support collaborative observational research. Supervised machine learning methods can be used to train phenotype classifiers in a high-throughput manner using imperfectly labeled data. We developed 10 phenotype classifiers using this approach and evaluated performance across multiple sites within the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) network. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe constructed classifiers using the Automated PHenotype Routine for Observational Definition, Identification, Training and Evaluation (APHRODITE) R-package, an open-source framework for learning phenotype classifiers using datasets in the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model. We labeled training data based on the presence of multiple mentions of disease-specific codes. Performance was evaluated on cohorts derived using rule-based definitions and real-world disease prevalence. Classifiers were developed and evaluated across 3 medical centers, including 1 international site.

resultsCompared to the multiple mentions labeling heuristic, classifiers showed a mean recall boost of 0.43 with a mean precision loss of 0.17. Performance decreased slightly when classifiers were shared across medical centers, with mean recall and precision decreasing by 0.08 and 0.01, respectively, at a site within the USA, and by 0.18 and 0.10, respectively, at an international site. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionWe demonstrate a high-throughput pipeline for constructing and sharing phenotype classifiers across sites within the OHDSI network using APHRODITE. Classifiers exhibit good portability between sites within the USA, however limited portability internationally, indicating that classifier generalizability may have geographic limitations, and, consequently, sharing the classifier-building recipe, rather than the pretrained classifiers, may be more useful for facilitating collaborative observational research.

Indexed as

Medical InformaticsSupervised Machine LearningClassificationData ScienceElectronic Health RecordsHumansObservational Studies as Topiccohort identificationelectronic health recordselectronic phenotypingmachine learningphenotype

Identifiers

PMID32374408
PMCPMC7309227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.