Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32374268›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Effect of Online Health Information Seeking on Anxiety in Hospitalized Pregnant Women: Cohort Study.

Fabiana Coglianese, Giulia Beltrame Vriz, Nicola Soriani, Gianluca Niccolò Piras, Rosanna Irene Comoretto, Laura Clemente, Jessica Fasan, Lucia Cristiano, Valentina Schiavinato, Valter Adamo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fabiana CoglianeseUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal-Infant Department, Santa Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1021-0023
Giulia Beltrame VrizDepartment of Obstetrics, Burlo Garofolo Pediatric Institute, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8656-2711
Nicola SorianiDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5258-1877
Gianluca Niccolò PirasDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8308-1373
Rosanna Irene ComorettoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-1899
Laura ClementeUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal-Infant Department, Santa Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2426-1163
Jessica FasanUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal-Infant Department, Santa Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-389X
Lucia CristianoUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal-Infant Department, Santa Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4037-5056
Valentina SchiavinatoDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7314-0405
Valter AdamoUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal-Infant Department, Santa Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4782-9284
Diego MarchesoniUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal-Infant Department, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4376-5199
Dario GregoriDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7906-0580
Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Degli Angeli · ITUniversity of Padua · ITIRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are approximately 1,000,000 pregnant women at high risk for obstetric complications per year, more than half of whom require hospitalization.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the relation between online health information seeking and anxiety levels in a sample of hospitalized woman with pregnancy-related complications.

methodsA sample of 105 pregnant women hospitalized in northern Italy, all with an obstetric complication diagnosis, completed different questionnaires: Use of Internet Health-information (UIH) questionnaire about use of the internet, EuroQOL 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire on quality of life, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire measuring general anxiety levels, and a questionnaire about critical events occurring during hospitalization.

resultsOverall, 98/105 (93.3%) of the women used the internet at home to obtain nonspecific information about health in general and 95/105 (90.5%) of the women used the internet to specifically search for information related to their obstetric disease. Online health information-seeking behavior substantially decreased the self-reported anxiety levels (P=.008).

conclusionsWeb browsing for health information was associated with anxiety reduction, suggesting that the internet can be a useful instrument in supporting professional intervention to control and possibly reduce discomfort and anxiety for women during complicated pregnancies.

Indexed as

anxietyinternet usepregnant womenweb health information

Identifiers

PMID32374268
PMCPMC7240442
OpenAlexW3007225931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.