Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32374079›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2020

lncRNAs classifier to accurately predict the recurrence of thymic epithelial tumors.

Yongchao Su, Yongbing Chen, Zuochun Tian, Chuangang Lu, Liang Chen, Ximiao Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Thymic Epithelial Neoplasms: Focusing on the Epigenetic Alterations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Identification and Characterization of Non-Coding RNAs in Thymoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yongchao SuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sanya Central Hospital, Sanya, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3630-364X
Yongbing ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7595-092X
Zuochun TianDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sanya Central Hospital, Sanya, China.
Chuangang LuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sanya Central Hospital, Sanya, China.
Liang ChenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Sanya Central Hospital, Sanya, China.
Ximiao MaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Haikou People's Hospital, Haikou, China.
Sanya Central Hospital · CNHaikou City People's Hospital · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which have little or no ability to encode proteins, have attracted special attention due to their potential role in cancer disease. In this study we aimed to establish a lncRNAs classifier to improve the accuracy of recurrence prediction for thymic epithelial tumors (TETs).

methodsTETs RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data set and the matched clinicopathologic information were downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas. Using univariate Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis, we developed a lncRNAs classifier related to recurrence. Functional analysis was conducted to investigate the potential biological processes of the lncRNAs target genes. The independent prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression model. Additionally, predictive ability and clinical application of the lncRNAs classifier were assessed, and compared with the Masaoka staging by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsFour recurrence-free survival (RFS)-related lncRNAs were identified, and the classifier consisting of the identified four lncRNAs was able to effectively divide the patients into high and low risk subgroups, with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.796 (three-year RFS) and 0.788 (five-year RFS), respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that the lncRNAs classifier was an independent recurrence risk factor. The AUC of the lncRNAs classifier in predicting RFS was significantly higher than the Masaoka staging system. Decision curve analysis further demonstrated that the lncRNAs classifier had a larger net benefit than the Masaoka staging system.

conclusionsA lncRNAs classifier for patients with TETs was an independent risk factor for RFS despite other clinicopathologic variables. It generated more accurate estimations of the recurrence probability when compared to the Masaoka staging system, but additional data is required before it can be used in clinical practice.

Indexed as

NomogramsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveChinaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialPrognosisRNA, Long NoncodinglncRNAs classifierpredictionrecurrence-free survivalthymic epithelial tumors

Identifiers

PMID32374079
PMCPMC7327696
OpenAlexW3022057472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.