ArticleThoracic cancer2020
lncRNAs classifier to accurately predict the recurrence of thymic epithelial tumors.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autophagy-Related Proteins' Immunohistochemical Expression and Their Potential Role as Biomarkers in Thymic Epithelial Tumors.Cancers · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and prognosis of thymic epithelial tumors: a systematic review.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2025Review
- Non-Mutational Key Features in the Biology of Thymomas.Cancers · 2024Review
- Histone Deacetylases (HDACs): Promising Biomarkers and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Thymic Epithelial Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Epigenetics of Thymic Epithelial Tumors.Cancers · 2023Review
- Promotor methylation status of MAPK4 is a novel epigenetic biomarker for prognosis of recurrence in patients with thymic epithelial tumors.Thoracic cancer · 2022Article
- Thymic epithelial tumors: examining the GTF2I mutation and developing a novel prognostic signature with LncRNA pairs to predict tumor recurrence.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Thymic Epithelial Neoplasms: Focusing on the Epigenetic Alterations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Long Non-Coding RNAs in the Cell Fate Determination of Neoplastic Thymic Epithelial Cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Identification and Characterization of Non-Coding RNAs in Thymoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which have little or no ability to encode proteins, have attracted special attention due to their potential role in cancer disease. In this study we aimed to establish a lncRNAs classifier to improve the accuracy of recurrence prediction for thymic epithelial tumors (TETs).
methodsTETs RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data set and the matched clinicopathologic information were downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas. Using univariate Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis, we developed a lncRNAs classifier related to recurrence. Functional analysis was conducted to investigate the potential biological processes of the lncRNAs target genes. The independent prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression model. Additionally, predictive ability and clinical application of the lncRNAs classifier were assessed, and compared with the Masaoka staging by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsFour recurrence-free survival (RFS)-related lncRNAs were identified, and the classifier consisting of the identified four lncRNAs was able to effectively divide the patients into high and low risk subgroups, with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.796 (three-year RFS) and 0.788 (five-year RFS), respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that the lncRNAs classifier was an independent recurrence risk factor. The AUC of the lncRNAs classifier in predicting RFS was significantly higher than the Masaoka staging system. Decision curve analysis further demonstrated that the lncRNAs classifier had a larger net benefit than the Masaoka staging system.
conclusionsA lncRNAs classifier for patients with TETs was an independent risk factor for RFS despite other clinicopathologic variables. It generated more accurate estimations of the recurrence probability when compared to the Masaoka staging system, but additional data is required before it can be used in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.