ArticleSaudi medical journal2020
Blood culture contamination in a tertiary care hospital of Saudi Arabia. A one-year study.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiyear experience with blood culture results from a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Integrating Lean Six Sigma into Microbiology Laboratories: Insights from a Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Blood culture contamination in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective three-year study.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Blood Culture Contamination Rate as a Quality Indicator - a Prospective Observational Study.Maedica · 2022Article
- Blood Culture Contamination: A Single General Hospital Experience of 2-Year Retrospective Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo monitor blood culture contamination (BCC) rates in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Methods: Blood cultures submitted to the Microbiology Laboratory of King Fahad Hospital, Madina, Saudi Arabia between January and December 2017 were analyzed prospectively. Positive blood cultures were either designated as true bacteremia with confirmed bloodstream infection or BCC.
resultsAmong 5,536 blood cultures from 2201 patients, 364 (6.6%) mirrored BCC. There was an upward trend in contamination rates in specific months. With respect to total blood cultures from respective units over a one-year period, medical ward contributed to the highest contamination rate (10.3%). Blood culture contamination rate in the wards ranged from 4.5-10.3%, with a higher contamination rate in elderly, aged 60-80 years. Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) was the most frequent contaminant (44.5%). Conclusion: The escalated contamination rates in September to October may be attributed to difficulty in sampling blood by the less competent nurses during annual pilgrimage season. High influx of patients and shortage of trained nurses may have resulted in increased incidence in December-January and March-April. The prevalence of skin-resident S. epidermidis may be due to improper aseptic conditions. Ours is the first report on evaluation of BCC rates in Madina and call for renewed efforts in this direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.