Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32373602›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

A Combined Geometric Morphometric and Discrete Element Modeling Approach for Hip Cartilage Contact Mechanics.

Jan Van Houcke, Emmanuel A Audenaert, Penny R Atkins, Andrew E Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neonatal Hip Loading in Developmental Dysplasia: Finite Element Simulation of Proximal Femur Growth and Treatment.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Personalized statistical modeling of soft tissue structures in the knee.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Wear patterns in knee OA correlate with native limb geometry.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Jan Van HouckeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Emmanuel A AudenaertDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Penny R AtkinsDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Andrew E AndersonDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
University of Utah · USGhent University · BE

Funding

Finite Elements For Biomechanics And BiophysicsR01GM083925 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GERARD A. ATESHIAN, JEFFREY A. WEISS · 2008 to 2026
$7.6M
Population-Based Shape and Biomechanical Analysis of Hip PathoanatomyR01EB016701 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ANDERSON, ANDREW EDWARD · 2013 to 2023
$3.6M
Biomechanics of the Dysplastic HipR01AR053344 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WEISS, JEFFREY A. · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
Musculoskeletal and Finite Element Modeling of Femoroacetabular ImpingementR21AR063844 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ANDERSON, ANDREW EDWARD · 2013 to 2014
$349k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR053344NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR063844NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016701NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA) provides the current reference standard for numerical simulation of hip cartilage contact mechanics. Unfortunately, the development of subject-specific FEA models is a laborious process. Owed to its simplicity, Discrete Element Analysis (DEA) provides an attractive alternative to FEA. Advancements in computational morphometrics, specifically statistical shape modeling (SSM), provide the opportunity to predict cartilage anatomy without image segmentation, which could be integrated with DEA to provide an efficient platform to predict cartilage contact stresses in large populations. The objective of this study was, first, to validate linear and non-linear DEA against a previously validated FEA model and, second, to present and evaluate the applicability of a novel population-averaged cartilage geometry prediction method against previously used methods to estimate cartilage anatomy. The population-averaged method is based on average cartilage thickness maps and therefore allows for a more accurate and individualized cartilage geometry estimation when combined with SSM. The root mean squared error of the population-averaged cartilage geometry predicted by SSM as compared to the manually segmented cartilage geometry was 0.31 ± 0.08 mm. Identical boundary and loading conditions were applied to the DEA and FEA models. Predicted DEA stress distribution patterns and magnitude of peak stresses were in better agreement with FEA for the novel cartilage anatomy prediction method as compared to commonly used parametric methods based on the estimation of acetabular and femoral head radius. Still, contact stress was overestimated and contact area was underestimated for all cartilage anatomy prediction methods. Linear and non-linear DEA methods differed mainly in peak stress results with the non-linear definition being more sensitive to detection of high peak stresses. In conclusion, DEA in combination with the novel population-averaged cartilage anatomy prediction method provided accurate predictions while offering an efficient platform to conduct population-wide analyses of hip contact mechanics.

Indexed as

cartilage predictioncontact mechanicsdiscrete element analysisfinite element analysiship joint

Identifiers

PMID32373602
PMCPMC7186355
OpenAlexW3018856356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.