ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020
A Combined Geometric Morphometric and Discrete Element Modeling Approach for Hip Cartilage Contact Mechanics.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contact Stress Elevations Following Acetabular Fracture Fixation are Associated With Radiographic Osteoarthritis At Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up.The Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2026Article
- Incorporating patient-specific hip orientation from weightbearing computed tomography affects discrete element analysis-computed regional joint contact mechanics in individuals treated with periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2024Article
- How to start with hip arthroscopy in a safe and effective manner, using an evidence-based approach.SICOT-J · 2024Article
- Neonatal Hip Loading in Developmental Dysplasia: Finite Element Simulation of Proximal Femur Growth and Treatment.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2023Article
- A Correspondence-Based Network Approach for Groupwise Analysis of Patient-Specific Spatiotemporal Data.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Personalized statistical modeling of soft tissue structures in the knee.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- A Musculoskeletal Model for Estimating Hip Contact Pressure During Walking.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022Article
- Wear patterns in knee OA correlate with native limb geometry.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Finite element analysis (FEA) provides the current reference standard for numerical simulation of hip cartilage contact mechanics. Unfortunately, the development of subject-specific FEA models is a laborious process. Owed to its simplicity, Discrete Element Analysis (DEA) provides an attractive alternative to FEA. Advancements in computational morphometrics, specifically statistical shape modeling (SSM), provide the opportunity to predict cartilage anatomy without image segmentation, which could be integrated with DEA to provide an efficient platform to predict cartilage contact stresses in large populations. The objective of this study was, first, to validate linear and non-linear DEA against a previously validated FEA model and, second, to present and evaluate the applicability of a novel population-averaged cartilage geometry prediction method against previously used methods to estimate cartilage anatomy. The population-averaged method is based on average cartilage thickness maps and therefore allows for a more accurate and individualized cartilage geometry estimation when combined with SSM. The root mean squared error of the population-averaged cartilage geometry predicted by SSM as compared to the manually segmented cartilage geometry was 0.31 ± 0.08 mm. Identical boundary and loading conditions were applied to the DEA and FEA models. Predicted DEA stress distribution patterns and magnitude of peak stresses were in better agreement with FEA for the novel cartilage anatomy prediction method as compared to commonly used parametric methods based on the estimation of acetabular and femoral head radius. Still, contact stress was overestimated and contact area was underestimated for all cartilage anatomy prediction methods. Linear and non-linear DEA methods differed mainly in peak stress results with the non-linear definition being more sensitive to detection of high peak stresses. In conclusion, DEA in combination with the novel population-averaged cartilage anatomy prediction method provided accurate predictions while offering an efficient platform to conduct population-wide analyses of hip contact mechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.