Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32373486›Full record

ReviewAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin2020

Cyclodextrin Based Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery and Theranostics.

Dipak Dilip Gadade, Sanjay Sudhakar Pekamwar

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Nanoencapsulation ofRSC advances · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Cyclodextrin-based therapeutics delivery systems: A review of current clinical trials.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dipak Dilip GadadeDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Shri Bhagwan College of Pharmacy, CIDCO, N-6, Dr. Y.S. Khedkar Marg, Aurangabad-431001, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3837-2486
Sanjay Sudhakar PekamwarSchool of Pharmacy, SRTM University,Vishnupuri, Nanded- 431606, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4308-071X
Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colloidal nanoparticulate technology has been described in the literature as a versatile drug delivery system. But it possesses some inherent lacunae in their formulation. Cyclodextrins (CDs) have been extensively reported for the solubility enhancement of poorly water-soluble drugs. The CDs can cause intervention in aspects related to nanoparticles (NPs) that include improving drug loading in nano-system, improving stability, site-specific/targeted drug delivery, improving solubility profile and absorption of the drug in nanosystem with consequent improvement in bioavailability, with the possibility of controlled release, safety and efficacy. They find application in for simultaneous diagnosis and therapeutics for better treatment procedures. The current communication is focused on the application of CDs to overcome troubles in nanoparticulate formulation and enhancement of their performance. It also envisages the theranostic aspects of CDs.

Indexed as

Controlled releaseCyclodextrinNanoparticleSolubilityStabilityTheranotics

Identifiers

PMID32373486
PMCPMC7191229
OpenAlexW3006817825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.