Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32373152›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020

Genomic Breeding Programs Realize Larger Benefits by Cooperation in the Presence of Genotype × Environment Interaction Than Conventional Breeding Programs.

Lu Cao, Huiming Liu, Han A Mulder, Mark Henryon, Jørn Rind Thomasen, Morten Kargo, Anders Christian Sørensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Derivation of Economic Values for Breeding Objective Traits of Chinese Holstein Dairy Cows Using a Bio-Economic Model.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Assessing Genetic Variation amongPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lu CaoCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Huiming LiuCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Han A MulderWageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Mark HenryonDanish Pig Research Centre, SEGES, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jørn Rind ThomasenVikingGenetics, Randers, Denmark.
Morten KargoCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Anders Christian SørensenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotype × environment interaction (G × E) is of increasing importance for dairy cattle breeders due to international multiple-environment selection of animals as well as the differentiation of production environments within countries. This theoretical simulation study tested the hypothesis that genomic selection (GS) breeding programs realize larger genetic benefits by cooperation in the presence of G × E than conventional pedigree-based selection (PS) breeding programs. We simulated two breeding programs each with their own cattle population and environment. Two populations had either equal or unequal population sizes. Selection of sires was done either across environments (cooperative) or within their own environment (independent). Four scenarios, (GS/PS) × (cooperative/independent), were performed. The genetic correlation (

Indexed as

across-environment selection of siresgenetic gainjoint genetic evaluationlong-term cooperationrate of inbreedingstochastic simulation

Identifiers

PMID32373152
PMCPMC7186425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.