Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32372942›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2020

Development and Evaluation of Maze-Like Puzzle Games to Assess Cognitive and Motor Function in Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Tobias Nef, Alvin Chesham, Narayan Schütz, Angela Amira Botros, Tim Vanbellingen, Jean-Marc Burgunder, Julia Müllner, René Martin Müri, Prabitha Urwyler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tobias NefGerontechnology & Rehabilitation, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Alvin CheshamGerontechnology & Rehabilitation, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Narayan SchützGerontechnology & Rehabilitation, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Angela Amira BotrosGerontechnology & Rehabilitation, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Tim VanbellingenGerontechnology & Rehabilitation, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jean-Marc BurgunderNeurozentrum Siloah and Department of Neurology, Swiss Huntington's Disease Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Julia MüllnerDepartment of Neurology, University Neurorehabilitation, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
René Martin MüriGerontechnology & Rehabilitation, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Prabitha UrwylerGerontechnology & Rehabilitation, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHLuzerner Kantonsspital · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is currently a need for engaging, user-friendly, and repeatable tasks for assessment of cognitive and motor function in aging and neurodegenerative diseases. This study evaluated the feasibility of a maze-like Numberlink puzzle game in assessing differences in game-based measures of cognition and motor function due to age and neurodegenerative diseases. Fifty-five participants, including young (18-31 years,

Indexed as

agingcognitive assessmentmaze taskneurodegenerative diseasespuzzle video games

Identifiers

PMID32372942
PMCPMC7188385
OpenAlexW3019931313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.