Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32372937›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in computational neuroscience2020

Attention in Psychology, Neuroscience, and Machine Learning.

Grace W Lindsay

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06782360 (CAMSAN), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06782360 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

CAMSAN: Cognitive Augmentation Via Multimodal Sensing and Auricular Neurostimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorOpenBCIRan2025 to 2026Enrolled45ConditionsHealthy, Cognitive Change, Effects of External Neurostimulation on CognitionArmsActive Neurostimulation, Sham Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. From generative AI to the brain: five takeaways.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Grace W LindsayGatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, Sainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention is the important ability to flexibly control limited computational resources. It has been studied in conjunction with many other topics in neuroscience and psychology including awareness, vigilance, saliency, executive control, and learning. It has also recently been applied in several domains in machine learning. The relationship between the study of biological attention and its use as a tool to enhance artificial neural networks is not always clear. This review starts by providing an overview of how attention is conceptualized in the neuroscience and psychology literature. It then covers several use cases of attention in machine learning, indicating their biological counterparts where they exist. Finally, the ways in which artificial attention can be further inspired by biology for the production of complex and integrative systems is explored.

Indexed as

artificial neural networksattentionawarenessmachine learningmemoryvision

Identifiers

PMID32372937
PMCPMC7177153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.