ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020
Concurrent Imaging of Markers of Current Flow and Neurophysiological Changes During tDCS.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dose-response in modulating brain function with transcranial direct current stimulation: From local to network levels.PLoS computational biology · 2023Trial
- Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in depression induces structural plasticity.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- In-vivo imaging of targeting and modulation of depression-relevant circuitry by transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomized clinical trial.Translational psychiatry · 2021Trial
- Effects of tDCS of the DLPFC on brain networks: A hybrid brain modeling study.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- MR imaging of the magnetic fields induced by injected currents can guide improvements of individualized head volume conductor models.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Psychiatric outcomes and overall functioning in healthcare students during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.Trends in psychiatry and psychotherapy · 2023Article
- Modulation of brain networks during MR-compatible transcranial direct current stimulation.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Inconsistencies in mapping current distribution in transcranial direct current stimulation.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2022Article
- Dataset of concurrent EEG, ECG, and behavior with multiple doses of transcranial electrical stimulation.Scientific data · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite being a popular neuromodulation technique, clinical translation of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is hampered by variable responses observed within treatment cohorts. Addressing this challenge has been difficult due to the lack of an effective means of mapping the neuromodulatory electromagnetic fields together with the brain's response. In this study, we present a novel imaging technique that provides the capability of concurrently mapping markers of tDCS currents, as well as the brain's response to tDCS. A dual-echo echo-planar imaging (DE-EPI) sequence is used, wherein the phase of the acquired MRI-signal encodes the tDCS current induced magnetic field, while the magnitude encodes the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) contrast. The proposed technique was first validated in a custom designed phantom. Subsequent test-retest experiments in human participants showed that tDCS-induced magnetic fields can be detected reliably
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.