Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32372895›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Disentangling the Amyloid Pathways: A Mechanistic Approach to Etiology.

Maja Malmberg, Tarja Malm, Oskar Gustafsson, Andrea Sturchio, Caroline Graff, Alberto J Espay, Anthony P Wright, Samir El Andaloussi, Anders Lindén, Kariem Ezzat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Physics of Protein Aggregation in Normal and Accelerated Brain Aging.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Targeted Molecular Therapeutics for Parkinson's Disease: A Role for Antisense Oligonucleotides?Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Maja MalmbergSection of Virology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Tarja MalmA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Oskar GustafssonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andrea SturchioDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, James J and Joan A Gardner Center for Parkinson Disease and Movement Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Caroline GraffDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Alberto J EspayDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, James J and Joan A Gardner Center for Parkinson Disease and Movement Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Anthony P WrightDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Samir El AndaloussiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anders LindénUnit for Lung and Airway Research, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kariem EzzatDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Cincinnati · USKarolinska University Hospital · SESwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyloids are fibrillar protein aggregates associated with diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), type II diabetes and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. The process of amyloid polymerization involves three pathological protein transformations; from natively folded conformation to the cross-β conformation, from biophysically soluble to insoluble, and from biologically functional to non-functional. While amyloids share a similar cross-β conformation, the biophysical transformation can either take place spontaneously via a homogeneous nucleation mechanism (HON) or catalytically on an exogenous surface via a heterogeneous nucleation mechanism (HEN). Here, we postulate that the different nucleation pathways can serve as a mechanistic basis for an etiological classification of amyloidopathies, where hereditary forms generally follow the HON pathway, while sporadic forms follow seed-induced (prions) or surface-induced (including microbially induced) HEN pathways. Critically, the conformational and biophysical amyloid transformation results in loss-of-function (LOF) of the original natively folded and soluble protein. This LOF can, at least initially, be the mechanism of amyloid toxicity even before amyloid accumulation reaches toxic levels. By highlighting the important role of non-protein species in amyloid formation and LOF mechanisms of toxicity, we propose a generalized mechanistic framework that could help better understand the diverse etiology of amyloid diseases and offer new opportunities for therapeutic interventions, including replacement therapies.

Indexed as

Alzheiemr’samyloidnucleationParkinson’sprionprotein-only hypothesisvirus

Identifiers

PMID32372895
PMCPMC7186396
OpenAlexW2979627149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.