Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32372696›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2020

Pulsed Field Ablation Using a Lattice Electrode for Focal Energy Delivery: Biophysical Characterization, Lesion Durability, and Safety Evaluation.

Hagai Yavin, Ayelet Shapira-Daniels, Michael Barkagan, Jakub Sroubek, David Shim, Raffaele Melidone, Elad Anter

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06364215 (Posterior Wall Substrate Modification Using Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06364215 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Posterior Wall Substrate Modification Using Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

TypeinterventionalSponsorJorge RomeroRan2024 to 2025Enrolled198ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation ParoxysmalArmsFarapulse PFA, Pulmonary Vein Isolation alone, Farapulse PFA, Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Left atrial Posterior Wall Isolation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. First-in-human clinical series of a novel conformable large-lattice pulsed field ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Multi-modality imaging assessment of microbubbles and cerebral emboli in left ventricular pulsed field ablation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  8. Multi-modality imaging assessment of microbubbles and cerebral emboli in left ventricular pulsed field ablation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Epicardial tissue heating during pulsed field ablation assessed using a novel experimental model: implications for collateral damage.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Pulsed field ablation: focused on atrial fibrillation ablation.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hagai YavinCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, OH (H.Y., E.A.).
Ayelet Shapira-DanielsHarvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.S.-D., M.B., J.S., D.S.).
Michael BarkaganHarvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.S.-D., M.B., J.S., D.S.).
Jakub SroubekHarvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.S.-D., M.B., J.S., D.S.).
David ShimHarvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.S.-D., M.B., J.S., D.S.).
Raffaele MelidoneHarvard-CBSET, Department of Pathology, Lexington, MA (R.M.).
Elad AnterCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, OH (H.Y., E.A.).
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USIIT@Harvard · US

Funding

Training Program in Cardiovascular ResearchT32HL007374 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI MITTLEMAN, MURRAY A · 1985 to 2019
$7.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulsed field ablation (PFA) is a nonthermal energy that may provide safety advantages over radiofrequency ablation (RFA). One-shot PFA catheters have been developed for pulmonary vein isolation, but they do not permit flexible lesion sets. This study investigated a novel lattice-tip catheter designed for focal RFA or PFA ablation.

methodsThe effects of PFA (biphasic, 24 amperes) were investigated in 25 swine using a lattice-tip catheter and system (Affera Inc). Step 1 (n=14) examined the feasibility to create atrial line of block and described its acute effects on the phrenic nerve and esophagus. Step 2 (n=7) examined the subacute effects of PFA on block durability, phrenic nerve, and esophagus ≥2 weeks. Step 3 compared the effects of PFA and RFA on the esophagus using a mechanical deviation model approximating the esophagus to the right atrium (n=4) and by direct ablation within its lumen (n=4). The effects of endocardial PFA and RFA on the phrenic nerve were also compared (n=10). Histological analysis was performed.

resultsPFA produced acute block in 100% of lines, achieved with 2.1 (1.3-3.2) applications/cm line. Histological analysis following (35 [18-37]) days showed 100% transmurality (thickness range 0.4-3.4 mm) with a lesion width of 19.4 (10.9-27.4 mm). PFA selectively affected cardiomyocytes but spared blood vessels and nervous tissue. PFA applied from the posterior atria (23 [21-25] applications) to the approximated esophagus (6 [4.5-14] mm) produced transmural lesions without esophageal injury. PFA (16.5 [15-18] applications) applied inside the esophageal lumen produced mild edema compared with RFA (13 [12-14] applications) which produced epithelial ulcerations. PFA resulted in no or transient stunning of the phrenic nerve (<5 minutes) without histological changes while RFA produced paralysis.

conclusionsPFA using a lattice-tip ablation catheter for focal ablation produced durable atrial lesions and showed lower vulnerability to esophageal or phrenic nerve damage compared with RFA.

Indexed as

Cardiac CathetersElectrodesAnimalsCardiac CatheterizationCatheter AblationEquipment DesignEsophagusHeart AtriaPeripheral Nerve InjuriesPhrenic NerveSus scrofaTime Factorsatrial fibrillationcatheter ablationesophagusparalysispulmonary veins

Identifiers

PMID32372696
PMCPMC7338046
OpenAlexW3021352261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.