Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32372517›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2020

"We Kind of Met In-Between": A Qualitative Analysis of Young Couples' Relationship Dynamics and Negotiations About Pregnancy Intentions.

Stephanie Arteaga, Margaret Mary Downey, Bridget Freihart, Anu Manchikanti Gómez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephanie ArteagaSexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley.
Margaret Mary DowneySexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley.
Bridget FreihartSexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley.
Anu Manchikanti GómezSexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley.

Funding

Dev-Core-001P2CHD073964 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI EDWARD ANDREW MIGUEL · 2019 to 2026
$2.9M
A Couple-Level Approach to Preventing Unintended Pregnancy among Young LatinasR00HD070874 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI GOMEZ, ANU MANCHIKANTI · 2014 to 2016
$692k
Berkeley Population CenterR24HD073964 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HOUT, MICHAEL · 2014 to 2017
$466k
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD073964NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD070874NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD073964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe literature on reproductive decision making often focuses on women and neglects the role of men and the importance of relationship context. Research with couples is vital to understanding joint decision making regarding having children at various stages of a couple's relationship and an individual's life course.

methodsIn-depth, individual interviews were conducted with a socioeconomically, racially and ethnically diverse sample of 50 young heterosexual women and their male partners in northern California in 2015-2016. A dyadic, thematic analytic approach was used to examine whether and how prospective pregnancy intentions and current pregnancy desires are negotiated at the couple level, and how relationship dynamics influence any negotiation and decision-making processes.

resultsTwenty-three couples described engaging in joint pregnancy decision making, which required purposeful communication and, for some, compromise and acceptance. For nearly all of these couples, these processes led to aligned prospective pregnancy intentions, even when current pregnancy desires differed. The remaining 27 couples described individual pregnancy decision-making processes; many respondents reported intentions that aligned with their partner's by happenstance, despite some respondents having avoided communicating their desires to their partner. Some of these couples faced relationship difficulties, including poor communication, leading some participants to misinterpret or be unaware of their partner's pregnancy intentions and desires.

conclusionsThe relationship context is important in the formulation of prospective pregnancy intentions among young people. Counseling protocols, interventions and policies that attend to the complex factors that influence young couples' pregnancy decision making are needed to better help couples attain their reproductive goals.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsInterpersonal RelationsCaliforniaDecision MakingFemaleHeterosexualityHumansIntentionMaleNegotiatingPregnancyQualitative ResearchReproductive BehaviorSexual PartnersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32372517
PMCPMC8699581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.