Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32372493›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2020

Patient participation in gastrointestinal endoscopy - From patients' perspectives.

Hanna Dubois, Johan Creutzfeldt, Monita Törnqvist, Mia Bergenmar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Review
  11. Patient participation in gastrointestinal endoscopy - From patients' perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hanna DuboisDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8766-3864
Johan CreutzfeldtDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Monita TörnqvistKarolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mia BergenmarDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SESophiahemmet University College · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient participation is associated with satisfaction and improved health-related outcomes. In gastrointestinal endoscopy, patient participation is an underexplored area.

objectiveTo gain understanding on patients' experiences, attitudes and preferences concerning patient participation in the endoscopy pathway.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with endoscopy patients (n = 17, female n = 8, male n = 9, ages 19-80 years) were performed. Interview transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Participants were recruited by purposive sampling from an endoscopy unit in a Swedish university hospital. Inclusion:≥ 18 years, fluency in Swedish and recent experience of endoscopy at the unit.

resultsFive generic categories emerged, two within the area of the patient's role, which was described as active or passive/included or excluded. Another three generic categories related to factors, critical to active participation, including organizational aspects, impressions of staff and individual circumstances were identified. In this context, patient participation described in the interviews was on a low to basic level, although sometimes reaching a higher level when staff 'invited' patients in decision making. DISCUSSION: This study contributes to the understanding of patient participation in endoscopy. Patients are in an inferior position and need support from the staff for an active role in their care. Although there were variations on the perceived importance of different factors, a heavy responsibility lies on the endoscopy staff to acknowledge the patients' individual needs and to facilitate patient participation.

conclusionsEndoscopy staff has a key role in supporting patient participation. In endoscopy settings, patient participation is vulnerable to multiple factors.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalPatient ParticipationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSwedenYoung Adultattitudescolonoscopycommunicationendoscopygastrointestinalgastroscopyhealth knowledgepatient-centred carepatient participationpracticeprofessional-patient relationsqualitative researchsigmoidoscopy

Identifiers

PMID32372493
PMCPMC7495085
OpenAlexW3021606036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.