Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32372453›Full record

ArticleCancer science2020

Human papillomavirus genotype contribution to cervical cancer and precancer: Implications for screening and vaccination in Japan.

Mamiko Onuki, Koji Matsumoto, Takashi Iwata, Kasumi Yamamoto, Yoichi Aoki, Shoji Maenohara, Naotake Tsuda, Shoji Kamiura, Kazuhiro Takehara, Koji Horie and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine combined with screening for cervical cancer in Japan.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Mamiko OnukiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji MatsumotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6184-618X
Takashi IwataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kasumi YamamotoGynecologic Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan.
Yoichi AokiDepartment of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoji MaenoharaGynecology Service, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Naotake TsudaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Shoji KamiuraDepartment of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuhiro TakeharaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8808-3338
Koji HorieDepartment of Gynecology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Nobutaka TasakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Hideaki YahataDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yuji TakeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Yoichi AokiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.
Hisamori KatoDepartment of Gynecology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takeshi MotoharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Keiichiro NakamuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4609-5258
Mitsuya IshikawaDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuya KatoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroyuki YoshidaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Noriomi MatsumuraDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hidekatsu NakaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Shogo ShigetaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Fumiaki TakahashiDivision of Medical Engineering, Department of Information Science, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
Kiichiro NodaKindai University, Osaka, Japan.
Nobuo YaegashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Hiroyuki YoshikawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Kindai University · JPShowa University · JPTohoku University · JPUniversity of the Ryukyus · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPHokkaido University · JPHyogo Prefectural Cancer Center · JPIwate Medical University · JPJichi Medical University · JPKanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization · JPKeio University · JPKumamoto University · JPKurume University · JPKyoto University · JPKyushu University · JPNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JPOkayama University · JPOsaka International Cancer Institute · JPSaitama Cancer Center · JPSaitama Medical University · JP

Funding

Foundation for Advancement of International Science (FAIS)Japan Agency of Medical Research and Development (AMED) 20fk0108098MEXT KAKENHI 17K11297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To obtain baseline data for cervical cancer prevention in Japan, we analyzed human papillomavirus (HPV) data from 5045 Japanese women aged less than 40 years and diagnosed with cervical abnormalities at 21 hospitals during 2012-2017. These included cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1, n = 573), CIN2-3 (n = 3219), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS, n = 123), and invasive cervical cancer (ICC, n = 1130). The Roche Linear Array was used for HPV genotyping. The HPV type-specific relative contributions (RCs) were estimated by adding multiple infections to single types in accordance with proportional weighting attributions. Based on the comparison of type-specific RCs between CIN1 and CIN2-3/AIS/ICC (CIN2+), RC ratios were calculated to estimate type-specific risks for progression to CIN2+. Human papillomavirus DNA was detected in 85.5% of CIN1, 95.7% of CIN2-3/AIS, and 91.2% of ICC. Multiple infections decreased with disease severity: 42.9% in CIN1, 40.4% in CIN2-3/AIS, and 23.7% in ICC (P < .0001). The relative risk for progression to CIN2+ was highest for HPV16 (RC ratio 3.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.01-4.98), followed by HPV31 (2.51, 1.54-5.24), HPV18 (2.43, 1.59-4.32), HPV35 (1.56, 0.43-8.36), HPV33 (1.01, 0.49-3.31), HPV52 (0.99, 0.76-1.33), and HPV58 (0.97, 0.75-1.32). The relative risk of disease progression was 1.87 (95% CI, 1.71-2.05) for HPV16/18/31/33/35/45/52/58, but only 0.17 (95% CI, 0.14-0.22) for HPV39/51/56/59/66/68. Human papillomavirus 16/18/31/33/45/52/58/6/11 included in a 9-valent vaccine contributed to 89.7% (95% CI, 88.7-90.7) of CIN2-3/AIS and 93.8% (95% CI, 92.4-95.3) of ICC. In conclusion, our data support the Japanese guidelines that recommend discriminating HPV16/18/31/33/35/45/52/58 genotypes for CIN management. The 9-valent vaccine is estimated to provide over 90% protection against ICC in young Japanese women.

Indexed as

GenotypeAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansJapanNeoplasm StagingPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPrecancerous ConditionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung Adultadenocarcinoma in situcervical intraepithelial neoplasiahuman papillomavirusinvasive cervical cancervaccine

Identifiers

PMID32372453
PMCPMC7385338
OpenAlexW3023946505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.