Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32372434›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2020

Deep phenotyping of cardiac function in heart transplant patients using cardiovascular system models.

Amanda L Colunga, Karam G Kim, N Payton Woodall, Todd F Dardas, John H Gennari, Mette S Olufsen, Brian E Carlson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Challenges and opportunities in uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Guidelines for mechanistic modeling and analysis in cardiovascular research.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda L ColungaNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8679-0562
Karam G KimUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8063-6081
N Payton WoodallNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.
Todd F DardasUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
John H GennariUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Mette S OlufsenNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2694-0044
Brian E CarlsonUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1353-5907
North Carolina State University · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Multi-scale systems analysis of blood pressure control and hypertensionR01HL139813 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BEARD, DANIEL A · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
Computational systems analysis of cardiac mechanical-energetic coupling in heart diseaseR01HL144657 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BEARD, DANIEL A · 2019 to 2022
$1.8M
Physiological Knowledge Integration and Recombinant Modeling Via Accelerated SemaR01LM011969 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CARLSON, BRIAN E., GENNARI, JOHN H. · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
Division of Mathematical Sciences 1246991NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL139813NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144657NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011969The National GEM ConsortiumU.S. National Library of Medicine R01 LM011969 04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsRight heart catheterization data from clinical records of heart transplant patients are used to identify patient-specific models of the cardiovascular system. These patient-specific cardiovascular models represent a snapshot of cardiovascular function at a given post-transplant recovery time point. This approach is used to describe cardiac function in 10 heart transplant patients, five of which had multiple right heart catheterizations allowing an assessment of cardiac function over time. These patient-specific models are used to predict cardiovascular function in the form of right and left ventricular pressure-volume loops and ventricular power, an important metric in the clinical assessment of cardiac function. Outcomes for the longitudinally tracked patients show that our approach was able to identify the one patient from the group of five that exhibited post-transplant cardiovascular complications. ABSTRACT: Heart transplant patients are followed with periodic right heart catheterizations (RHCs) to identify post-transplant complications and guide treatment. Post-transplant positive outcomes are associated with a steady reduction of right ventricular and pulmonary arterial pressures, toward normal levels of right-side pressure (about 20 mmHg) measured by RHC. This study shows that more information about patient progression is obtained by combining standard RHC measures with mechanistic computational cardiovascular system models. The purpose of this study is twofold: to understand how cardiovascular system models can be used to represent a patient's cardiovascular state, and to use these models to track post-transplant recovery and outcome. To obtain reliable parameter estimates comparable within and across datasets, we use sensitivity analysis, parameter subset selection, and optimization to determine patient-specific mechanistic parameters that can be reliably extracted from the RHC data. Patient-specific models are identified for 10 patients from their first post-transplant RHC, and longitudinal analysis is carried out for five patients. Results of the sensitivity analysis and subset selection show that we can reliably estimate seven non-measurable quantities; namely, ventricular diastolic relaxation, systemic resistance, pulmonary venous elastance, pulmonary resistance, pulmonary arterial elastance, pulmonary valve resistance and systemic arterial elastance. Changes in parameters and predicted cardiovascular function post-transplant are used to evaluate the cardiovascular state during recovery of five patients. Of these five patients, only one showed inconsistent trends during recovery in ventricular pressure-volume relationships and power output. At the four-year post-transplant time point this patient exhibited biventricular failure along with graft dysfunction while the remaining four exhibited no cardiovascular complications.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHeart TransplantationHeart VentriclesHumansModels, CardiovascularPulmonary ArteryVentricular Function, Rightcomputational physiologyheart transplantpatient-specific modelingright heart catheterization

Identifiers

PMID32372434
PMCPMC12128688
OpenAlexW3022022625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.