Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32372409›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia2020

The effect on consent rates for deceased organ donation in Wales after the introduction of an opt-out system.

S Madden, D Collett, P Walton, K Empson, J Forsythe, A Ingham, K Morgan, P Murphy, J Neuberger, D Gardiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Early experiences of deemed consent legislation for organ donation in Nova Scotia: a qualitative study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Solid Organ Donation and Transplantation in the United Kingdom: Good Governance is Key to Success.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating National Organ Donation and Transplantation Programs.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

S MaddenNHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK.
D CollettNHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK.
P WaltonNHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK.
K EmpsonCardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
J ForsytheNHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK.
A InghamBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK.
K MorganPublic Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.
P MurphyLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
J NeubergerQueen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
D GardinerNHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ transplantation saves and transforms lives. Failure to secure consent for organ retrieval is widely regarded as the single most important obstacle to transplantation. A soft opt-out system of consent for deceased organ donation was introduced into Wales in December 2015, whilst England maintained the existing opt-in system. Cumulative data on consent rates in Wales were compared with those in England, using a two-sided sequential procedure that was powered to detect an absolute difference in consent rates between England and Wales of 10%. Supplementary risk-adjusted logistic regression analysis examined whether any difference in consent rates between the two nations could be attributed to variations in factors known to influence UK consent rates. Between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018, 8192 families of eligible donors in England and 474 in Wales were approached regarding organ donation, with overall consent rates of 65% and 68%, respectively. There was a steady upward trend in the proportion of families consenting to donation after brain death in Wales as compared with England and after 33 months, this reached statistical significance. No evidence of any change in the donation after circulatory death consent rate was observed. Risk-adjusted logistic regression analysis revealed that by the end of the study period the probability of consent to organ donation in Wales was higher than in England (OR [95%CI] 2.1 [1.26-3.41]). The introduction of a soft opt-out system of consent in Wales significantly increased organ donation consent though the impact was not immediate.

Indexed as

Brain DeathDecision MakingHumansInformed ConsentTissue and Organ ProcurementWalesorgan donationpresumed consentpublic policytransplantation

Identifiers

PMID32372409
PMCPMC7496553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.