Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32372297›Full record

SynthesisCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2020

Therapeutic Hypothermia in Acute Ischemic Stroke-a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Andrea M Kuczynski, Sina Marzoughi, Abdulaziz S Al Sultan, Frederick Colbourne, Bijoy K Menon, Adriaan C G M van Es, Aaron L Berez, Mayank Goyal, Andrew M Demchuk, Mohammed A Almekhlafi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea M KuczynskiCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sina MarzoughiCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Abdulaziz S Al SultanCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Frederick ColbourneDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Bijoy K MenonCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Adriaan C G M van EsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Aaron L BerezAlembic, LLC, Mountain View, CA, 94043, USA.
Mayank GoyalCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Andrew M DemchukCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Mohammed A AlmekhlafiCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. mohammed.almekhlafi1@ucalgary.ca.
University of Calgary · CAOntario Brain Institute · CAErasmus University Rotterdam · NLUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTherapeutic hypothermia (TH) in stroke demonstrates robust neuroprotection in animals but clinical applications remain controversial. We assessed current literature on the efficacy of TH in ischemic stroke. RECENT

findingsWe conducted a meta-analysis comparing TH versus controls in studies published until June 2019. Controlled studies reporting on ≥ 10 adults with acute ischemic stroke were included. Primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] ≤ 2). Twelve studies (n = 351 TH, n = 427 controls) were included. Functional independence did not differ between groups (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.93-1.46, random-effects p = 0.2). Five studies reported individual mRS outcomes and demonstrated a shift toward better outcome with TH (unadjusted cOR 1.57, 95% CI 1.01-2.44, p = 0.05). Overall complications were higher with TH (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.06-1.32, p < 0.01). We did not observe an overall beneficial effect of TH in this analysis although some studies showed a shift toward better outcome. TH was associated with increased complications.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaHypothermia, InducedIschemic StrokeStrokeHumansTreatment OutcomeIschemic strokeMeta-analysisSelective coolingSystemic coolingTherapeutic hypothermia

Identifiers

PMID32372297
OpenAlexW3023629904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.