Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32372296›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2020

Strengthening spatial reasoning: elucidating the attentional and neural mechanisms associated with mental rotation skill development.

Katherine C Moen, Melissa R Beck, Stephanie M Saltzmann, Tovah M Cowan, Lauryn M Burleigh, Leslie G Butler, Jagannathan Ramanujam, Alex S Cohen, Steven G Greening

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Stimulus-specific influence of gender on mental-rotation-related brain activity.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. GPS Digital Nudge to Limit Road Crashes in Non-Expert Drivers.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine C MoenDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, 236 Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Melissa R BeckDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, 236 Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA. mbeck@lsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9489-7124
Stephanie M SaltzmannDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, 236 Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Tovah M CowanDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, 236 Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Lauryn M BurleighDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, 236 Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Leslie G ButlerDepartment of Chemistry, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Jagannathan RamanujamCenter for Computation and Technology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Alex S CohenDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, 236 Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Steven G GreeningDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, 236 Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Louisiana State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial reasoning is a critical skill in many everyday tasks and in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines. The current study examined how training on mental rotation (a spatial reasoning task) impacts the completeness of an encoded representation and the ability to rotate the representation. We used a multisession, multimethod design with an active control group to determine how mental rotation ability impacts performance for a trained stimulus category and an untrained stimulus category. Participants in the experimental group (n = 18) showed greater improvement than the active control group (n = 18) on the mental rotation tasks. The number of saccades between objects decreased and saccade amplitude increased after training, suggesting that participants in the experimental group encoded more of the object and possibly had more complete mental representations after training. Functional magnetic resonance imaging data revealed distinct neural activation associated with mental rotation, notably in the right motor cortex and right lateral occipital cortex. These brain areas are often associated with rotation and encoding complete representations, respectively. Furthermore, logistic regression revealed that activation in these brain regions during the post-training scan significantly predicted training group assignment. Overall, the current study suggests that effective mental rotation training protocols should aim to improve the encoding and manipulation of mental representations.

Indexed as

Practice, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAttentionBrain MappingFemaleHumansImaginationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor CortexOccipital LobeRotationSaccadesSpace PerceptionThinkingEncodingEye-trackingfMRIMental rotationObject representationsSpatial reasoningSTEM educationWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID32372296
PMCPMC7200965
OpenAlexW3023459416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.